LDV T60 Double Cab vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

LDV T60 Double Cab in South Africa

LDV T60 Double Cab

T60 Max Luxe 4WD Double Cab 6-Speed Manual Diesel 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 750,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 10.75 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

LDV T60 Double Cab vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab: the short answer

T60 Double Cab and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

T60 Double Cab starts ZAR 159,990 cheaper T60 Double Cab from ZAR 480,000 · Triton Double Cab from ZAR 639,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification T60 Double Cab Triton Double Cab
Maximum Power T60 Double Cab160 kW @ 4000 rpm Triton Double Cab150 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque T60 Double Cab500 Nm @ 1500-2400 rpm Triton Double Cab470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm
Engine Size T60 Double Cab1996 cc Triton Double Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy T60 Double Cab10.75 km/l Triton Double Cab11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance T60 Double Cab215 mm Triton Double Cab228 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

LDV T60 Double Cab

T60 Max Luxe 4WD Double Cab 6-Speed Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

T60 Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

T60 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec T60 Double Cab Triton Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2024 2024
Generation Current South African T60 Double Cab generation. Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History No later South African facelift is published. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024; Bi-Turbo added in 2026.
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-seat double-cab pickup Double-cab pickup
Model Year 2024 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Pickup One-ton double-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Pickup Light commercial vehicle
Spec T60 Double Cab Triton Double Cab
Length 5365 mm 5360 mm
Width 1900 mm 1930 mm
Height 1809 mm 1815 mm
Wheelbase 3155 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 215 mm 228 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 73 l 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1190 l 1262 l
Kerb Weight 2075 kg 2035 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3050 kg 3020 kg
Payload Capacity 975 kg 985 kg
Towing Capacity 3000 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.3 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 965 mm 972 mm
Front Legroom 1045 mm 1059 mm
Rear Legroom 880 mm 857 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This T60 Double Cab and Triton Double Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: T60 Double Cab 82 vs Triton Double Cab 75.

Efficiency index: T60 Double Cab 44 vs Triton Double Cab 47.

Safety-equipment index: T60 Double Cab 87 vs Triton Double Cab 95.

Practicality index: T60 Double Cab 87 vs Triton Double Cab 90.

Ownership-cover index: T60 Double Cab not separately scored vs Triton Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Triton Double Cab leads by 1 points

T60 Double Cab and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Leads by 1 points
77
#2

T60 Double Cab

73% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Efficiency 44
Performance 82
Efficiency 44
Safety 87
Practicality 87
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T60 Double Cab +7 Efficiency Triton Double Cab +3 Safety Triton Double Cab +8 Practicality Triton Double Cab +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

T60 Double Cab

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 44/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 87/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 77 pts for T60 Double Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Triton Double Cab leads. However, T60 Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

T60 Double Cab vs Triton Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.