JAC T9 Double Cab vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

JAC T9 Double Cab in South Africa

JAC T9 Double Cab

T9 2.0L CTi Hunter 4x2 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 629,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 144 kW 🔧 487 Nm ⛽ 12.66 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

JAC T9 Double Cab vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab: the short answer

T9 Double Cab and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

T9 Double Cab starts ZAR 90,090 cheaper T9 Double Cab from ZAR 549,900 · Triton Double Cab from ZAR 639,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification T9 Double Cab Triton Double Cab
Maximum Power T9 Double Cab144 kW @ 3014 rpm Triton Double Cab150 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque T9 Double Cab487 Nm Triton Double Cab470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm
Engine Size T9 Double Cab1999 cc Triton Double Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy T9 Double Cab12.66 km/l Triton Double Cab11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance T9 Double Cab210 mm Triton Double Cab228 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

T9 Double Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

T9 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec T9 Double Cab Triton Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2026 2024
Generation Current South African T9 Double Cab range verified on 7 September 2026 Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History No later South African facelift was identified in the current official model and brochure material Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024; Bi-Turbo added in 2026.
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style Double-cab bakkie Double-cab pickup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Double-cab bakkie One-ton double-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Double-cab pickup Light commercial vehicle
Spec T9 Double Cab Triton Double Cab
Length 5330 mm 5360 mm
Width 1965 mm 1930 mm
Height 1920 mm 1815 mm
Wheelbase 3110 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 228 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 l 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed 1262 l
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed 2035 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2945 kg 3020 kg
Payload Capacity 1000 kg 985 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed 2 rows
Doors Not Officially Disclosed 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.2 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 972 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1059 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 857 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This T9 Double Cab and Triton Double Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: T9 Double Cab 74 vs Triton Double Cab 75.

Efficiency index: T9 Double Cab 54 vs Triton Double Cab 47.

Safety-equipment index: T9 Double Cab 85 vs Triton Double Cab 95.

Practicality index: T9 Double Cab 86 vs Triton Double Cab 90.

Ownership-cover index: T9 Double Cab not separately scored vs Triton Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Triton Double Cab leads by 2 points

T9 Double Cab and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Leads by 2 points
76
#2

T9 Double Cab

59% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Practicality 86 Check Efficiency 54
Performance 74
Efficiency 54
Safety 85
Practicality 86
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Triton Double Cab +1 Efficiency T9 Double Cab +7 Safety Triton Double Cab +10 Practicality Triton Double Cab +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

T9 Double Cab

Performance 74/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 85/100
Practicality 86/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 76 pts for T9 Double Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Triton Double Cab leads. However, T9 Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
Amarok
Amarok
T9 Double Cab vs Amarok →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
Ranger XL
Ranger XL
T9 Double Cab vs Ranger XL →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
Hilux Double Cab
Hilux Double Cab
T9 Double Cab vs Hilux Double Cab →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
Hilux Xtra Cab
Hilux Xtra Cab
T9 Double Cab vs Hilux Xtra Cab →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
T9 Double Cab vs D-Max Double Cab →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
Ranger XLT
Ranger XLT
T9 Double Cab vs Ranger XLT →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Amarok
Amarok
Triton Double Cab vs Amarok →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Ranger XL
Ranger XL
Triton Double Cab vs Ranger XL →

T9 Double Cab vs Triton Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.