Mazda All-New CX-5 vs BAIC B30

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
BAIC B30 in South Africa

BAIC B30

B30 Elite Adventure Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 519,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 305 Nm ⛽ 12.41 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs BAIC B30: the short answer

All-New CX-5 and B30 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · B30: current from ZAR 519,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 B30
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm B30138 kW
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm B30305 Nm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc B301498 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l B3012.41 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm B30215 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

B30

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

B30

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec All-New CX-5 B30
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa Current first-generation BAIC B30 for South Africa, introduced locally for the 2025 model year with petrol and self-charging HEV derivatives.
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies The B30 was unveiled locally in August 2025 and launched in November 2025 as the first South African version; no later local facelift has been announced.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Five-door mid-size SUV
Model Year 2026 2025
Production Status upcoming active
Segment Medium SUV Mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle SUV
Spec All-New CX-5 B30
Length 4690 mm 4730 mm
Width 1860 mm 1910 mm
Height 1695 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2820 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 215 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight 1629 kg 1575 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 2034 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg 459 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 1007 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 1020 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 1012 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and B30 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs B30 59.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs B30 51.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs B30 92.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs B30 61.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs B30 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

All-New CX-5 leads by 2 points

All-New CX-5 and B30 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 68 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 82% source coverage
68
#1 Evidence leader

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 2 points
66
#2

B30

70% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 92
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance B30 +7 Efficiency All-New CX-5 +1 Safety All-New CX-5 +6 Practicality All-New CX-5 +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

B30

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda All-New CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 68 pts vs 66 pts for B30

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, All-New CX-5 leads. However, B30 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs B30 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.