MG HS vs MG ZS Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
VS
MG ZS Pro in South Africa

MG ZS Pro

1.5T CVT Luxury Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 431,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 275 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

MG HS vs MG ZS Pro: the short answer

HS and ZS Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

ZS Pro starts ZAR 102,300 cheaper HS from ZAR 499,900 · ZS Pro from ZAR 397,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification HS ZS Pro
Maximum Power HS170 kW ZS Pro125 kW
Maximum Torque HS370 Nm ZS Pro275 Nm
Engine Size HS1986 cc ZS Pro1496 cc
Combined Fuel Economy HS11.63 km/l ZS Pro14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance HS145 mm ZS Pro161 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

MG ZS Pro

1.5T CVT Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

ZS Pro

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

ZS Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec HS ZS Pro
Model Introduced Year 2025 2025
Generation Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains. Current South African ZS Pro compact SUV with a 1.5-litre turbo engine, CVT and two-grade matrix.
Facelift History Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active. Launched locally in 2025 while the value-led ZS remained current.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door mid-size SUV Five-door compact SUV
Model Year 2025 2025
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV Compact SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec HS ZS Pro
Length 4655 mm 4430 mm
Width 1890 mm 1818 mm
Height 1655 mm 1635 mm
Wheelbase 2765 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 145 mm 161 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 507 l 443 l
Kerb Weight 1590 kg 1390 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 1840 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 450 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.65 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 968 mm 875 mm
Rear Headroom 964 mm 865 mm
Front Legroom 1044 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 980 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This HS and ZS Pro comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: HS 70 vs ZS Pro 56.

Efficiency index: HS 46 vs ZS Pro 58.

Safety-equipment index: HS 98 vs ZS Pro 91.

Practicality index: HS 57 vs ZS Pro 55.

Ownership-cover index: HS not separately scored vs ZS Pro not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

HS leads by 4 points

HS and ZS Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 78% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Leads by 4 points
65
#2

ZS Pro

80% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Practicality 55
Performance 56
Efficiency 58
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +14 Efficiency ZS Pro +12 Safety HS +7 Practicality HS +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

ZS Pro

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 58/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG HS leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 65 pts for ZS Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, HS leads. However, ZS Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

HS
HS
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
HS vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
HS
HS
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
HS vs Outlander Sport →
HS
HS
VS
Jimny
Jimny
HS vs Jimny →
HS
HS
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
HS vs X70 Plus →
HS
HS
VS
CX-3
CX-3
HS vs CX-3 →
HS
HS
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
HS vs Jimny 5-Door →
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
ZS Pro vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
ZS Pro vs Outlander Sport →

HS vs ZS Pro questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.