Suzuki Baleno vs Suzuki Swift Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Suzuki Baleno in South Africa

Suzuki Baleno

1.5 GLX AT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 341,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Suzuki Swift Sport in South Africa

Suzuki Swift Sport

1.4 Turbo AT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 493,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 103 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 15.6 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Swift Sport
Fuel Economy Baleno
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality Baleno
🔑 Ownership Tie
Baleno starts ZAR 469900 cheaper Baleno from ZAR 269,900 · Swift Sport from ZAR 469,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Baleno Swift Sport
Engine Power 77 kW 103 kW
Torque 138 Nm 230 Nm
Engine Size 1462 cc 1373 cc
Claimed Mileage 17.5 km/l 15.6 km/l
Ground Clearance 150 mm 130 mm
Boot / Load Bay 314 l 265 l
Airbags 6 6
Kerb Weight 975 kg 990 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 5

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Baleno and Swift Sport are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Swift Sport +16 pts
Efficiency Baleno +7 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Baleno +5 pts
Ownership Equal

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Baleno

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Swift Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Highway Driving

Which One's Right for You?

Baleno

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Swift Sport

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Baleno Swift Sport
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Direct Injection
Engine Code K15B K14D
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Naturally Aspirated Turbocharged
Displacement 1462 cc 1373 cc
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Cylinder Bore 74.0 mm 74.0 mm
Piston Stroke 85.1 mm 79.4 mm
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.0:1
Engine Position Transverse Front-Mounted Transverse Front-Mounted
Variable Valve Timing VVT on Intake Camshaft Dual VVT on Intake and Exhaust
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection (MPFI) Direct Injection (DI) — BoosterJet
Turbocharger - Mitsubishi Turbocharged Intercooled
Power 77 kW 103 kW
Power @ RPM 6,000 rpm 5,500 rpm
Power 103 bhp 138 bhp
Torque 138 Nm 230 Nm
Torque @ RPM 4,400 rpm 2,000–3,500 rpm
Maximum Engine RPM 6800 rpm 6500 rpm
Engine Oil Capacity 3.7 l 3.7 l
Top Speed 175 km/h 210 km/h
0-100 km/h 11.5 sec 8.5 sec
Engine Displacement 1462 cc 1373 cc
Engine Displacement Cc 1462 cc 1373 cc
Engine Power kW 77 kW 103 kW
Engine Torque Nm 138 Nm 230 Nm
Max Power kW 77 kW 103 kW
Max Torque Nm 138 Nm 230 Nm
Maximum Power 77 kW 103 kW
Maximum Torque 138 Nm 230 Nm
Engine Config 1.5L K15B 4-Cylinder Petrol 1.4L K14D BoosterJet Turbo 4-Cylinder Petrol
Engine Type Config 1.5L K15B 4-Cylinder Petrol 1.4L K14D BoosterJet Turbo 4-Cylinder Petrol
Engine Cylinders 4 4
Engine Valves 4 4
Power kW Rpm 6,000 rpm 5,500 rpm
Torque Nm Rpm 4,400 rpm 2,000–3,500 rpm
0–100 km/h 11.5 sec 8.5 sec
Acceleration 0 100 11.5 sec 8.5 sec
Induction Naturally Aspirated Turbocharged
Turbo Type Naturally Aspirated Turbocharged
Power Assisted Steering Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS)
Battery Capacity - -
Charging Port - -
AC Charging Time - -
EV Range - -
Motor Power - -
Motor Torque - -
Motor Type - -
System Output - -
Combined System Power - -
Combined System Torque - -
Active Exhaust - -
Engine Displacement Litres 1462 cc 1373 cc
Engine 1.5L K15B 4-Cylinder Petrol 1.4L K14D BoosterJet Turbo 4-Cylinder Petrol
Fuel Grade Required 93 RON Unleaded Petrol 95 RON Unleaded Petrol
Motor Position - -
Spec Baleno Swift Sport
Transmission Automatic Automatic
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Gears 4 km/h 6 km/h
Drive Type FWD Two-wheel drive
Drivetrain Layout Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Final Drive Ratio 4.388:1 4.062:1
Steering Turns Lock to Lock 2.8 2.5
Clutch Type Single Dry Plate Diaphragm Single Dry Plate Diaphragm
LSD Available - -
Differential Lock - -
Transfer Case - -
Paddle Shifters - Sport Paddle Shifters on Steering Column
Transmission Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Type Automatic Automatic
Transmission Speeds 4 km/h 6 km/h
Drivetrain FWD Two-wheel drive
Axle Layout FWD Two-wheel drive
Automatic Shift Paddles - Sport Paddle Shifters on Steering Column
4WD Engagement - -
4WD Hi Range - -
4WD Lo Range - -
Transfer Case Guard - -
Low Range - -
Front Differential Lock - -
Rear Differential Lock - -
4WD Selector - -
Differential Type Front - -
Differential Type Rear - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Swift Sport leads by 2 points

Both Baleno and Swift Sport are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 61 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 94% confidence
61
#1 Winner

Swift Sport

94% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 60
Safety 76
Practicality 50
Ownership 71
Leads by 2 points
59
#2

Baleno

94% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 67
Safety 76
Practicality 55
Ownership 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Swift Sport +16 Efficiency Baleno +7 Safety Level Practicality Baleno +5 Ownership Level

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Swift Sport

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 71/100

Baleno

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 55/100
Ownership 71/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Suzuki Swift Sport wins with 61 pts vs 59 pts for Baleno

In structured scoring, Swift Sport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Baleno may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Swift Sport edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Baleno 67 vs Swift Sport 60. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Baleno 76, Swift Sport 76. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Baleno 71, Swift Sport 71. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Baleno 55, Swift Sport 50. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Baleno 34, Swift Sport 50. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Swift Sport edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Swift Sport scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Baleno and Swift Sport in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Baleno scores 34 vs 50.

Efficiency: Baleno scores 67 vs 60.

Safety: Baleno scores 76 vs 76.

Practicality: Baleno scores 55 vs 50.

Ownership: Baleno scores 71 vs 71.

Final structured scoring gives Swift Sport the advantage in this comparison.