Suzuki Baleno vs Honda Fit

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Suzuki Baleno in South Africa

Suzuki Baleno

1.5 GLX AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 341,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Honda Fit in South Africa

Honda Fit

1.5 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 380,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 109 kW 🔧 253 Nm ⛽ 26.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Fit
Fuel Economy Fit
🛡 Safety Fit
📦 Practicality Baleno
🔑 Ownership Baleno
Baleno starts ZAR 110,600 cheaper Baleno from ZAR 269,900 · Fit from ZAR 380,500

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Baleno Fit
Maximum Power 77 kW @ 6000 rpm 109 kW
Maximum Torque 138 Nm @ 4400 rpm 253 Nm
Engine Size 1462 cc 1498 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 17.5 km/l 26.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 150 mm 135 mm
Boot / Load Bay 314 l 304 l
Airbags 6 6
Kerb Weight 985 kg 1150 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 3

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Baleno and Fit are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Fit +14 pts
Efficiency Fit +28 pts
Safety Fit +4 pts
Practicality Baleno +6 pts
Ownership Baleno +11 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Baleno

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Catalogue-index leader

Fit

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Baleno

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Fit

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Baleno Fit
Model Introduced Year 2022 2022
Generation Second generation globally launched in 2022; entirely new platform and body compared to the first-generation Baleno; shares K15B engine with Fronx, Ertiga, XL6, and Grand Vitara for parts commonality Based on Honda’s global small car platform with focus on efficiency and space utilization
Facelift History Second-generation Baleno launched in SA in 2022 as a full redesign on a new platform — wider, longer, and significantly better specified than the first-generation model; no facelift of the second generation yet Latest generation introduced with hybrid technology and updated design
Facelift Launched Since 2022 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Hatchback
Color Note Pearl Arctic White, Metallic Grandeur Grey, Metallic Midnight Blue, Pearl Burning Red, Solid White White, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published published
Segment Hatchback Hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 975 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Type Hatchback Hatchback
Spec Baleno Fit
Length 3990 mm 3995 mm
Width 1745 mm 1695 mm
Height 1500 mm 1515 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 2530 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 150 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 40 l
Boot/Cargo Space 314 l 304 l
Kerb Weight 985 kg 1150 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1430 kg 1550 kg
Payload Capacity 445 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m -
Front Headroom 993 mm -
Rear Headroom 985 mm -
Front Legroom 1043 mm -
Rear Legroom 900 mm -
Towing Capacity - 800 kg

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Fit leads by 6 points

Baleno and Fit are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 67 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 91% source coverage
67
#1 Index leader

Fit

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 95 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 95
Safety 91
Practicality 49
Ownership 60
Leads by 6 points
61
#2

Baleno

89% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 67
Safety 87
Practicality 55
Ownership 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Fit +14 Efficiency Fit +28 Safety Fit +4 Practicality Baleno +6 Ownership Baleno +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Fit

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 95/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 49/100
Ownership 60/100

Baleno

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 55/100
Ownership 71/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Honda Fit leads the catalogue index with 67 pts vs 61 pts for Baleno

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Fit leads. However, Baleno may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Baleno and Fit comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Baleno 34 vs Fit 48.

Efficiency index: Baleno 67 vs Fit 95.

Safety-equipment index: Baleno 87 vs Fit 91.

Practicality index: Baleno 55 vs Fit 49.

Ownership-cover index: Baleno 71 vs Fit 60.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.