Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs iCAUR V23

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

2.4L DI-DC 8-speed A/T 4X4 Exceed Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 904,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 133 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
iCAUR V23 in South Africa

iCAUR V23

2WD Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 519,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 100 kW 🔧 180 Nm ⛽ Not applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs iCAUR V23: the short answer

Pajero Sport and V23 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

V23 starts ZAR 270,090 cheaper Pajero Sport from ZAR 789,990 · V23 from ZAR 519,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Pajero Sport V23
Maximum Power Pajero Sport133 kW @ 3500 rpm V23100 kW
Maximum Torque Pajero Sport430 Nm @ 2500 rpm V23180 Nm
Engine Size Pajero Sport2442 cc V23Not applicable — battery electric vehicle
Combined Fuel Economy Pajero Sport12.3 km/l V23Not applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l
Ground Clearance Pajero Sport218 mm V23190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Pajero Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

V23

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Pajero Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

V23

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Pajero Sport V23
Model Introduced Year 2017 2026
Generation Third-generation Pajero Sport, 2025 facelift South African May 2026 local specification sheet for the current V23 generation.
Facelift History South African facelift launched in May 2025. -
Facelift Launched Since Current specification -
Facelift Version Ending Current -
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Published
Segment Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV Electric SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Passenger vehicle
Spec Pajero Sport V23
Length 4825 mm 4220 mm
Width 1815 mm 1915 mm
Height 1805 mm 1845 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2735 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 218 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 190 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 l Not applicable — battery electric vehicle
Boot/Cargo Space 193 l 372 L rear seats up; 994 L with rear seats folded
Kerb Weight 2080 kg 1550–1850 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2775 kg 2085 kg
Payload Capacity 695 kg 350–650 kg
Towing Capacity 2850 kg -
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.9 m
Front Headroom 1022 mm 1020 mm
Rear Headroom 957 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 1067 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 880 mm 970 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Pajero Sport and V23 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Pajero Sport 65 vs V23 41.

Efficiency index: Pajero Sport 49 vs V23 99.

Safety-equipment index: Pajero Sport 72 vs V23 93.

Practicality index: Pajero Sport 71 vs V23 60.

Ownership-cover index: Pajero Sport not separately scored vs V23 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

V23 leads by 6 points

Pajero Sport and V23 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 67% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

V23

67% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 99 Check Performance 41
Performance 41
Efficiency 99
Safety 93
Practicality 60
Leads by 6 points
65
#2

Pajero Sport

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 65
Efficiency 49
Safety 72
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Pajero Sport +24 Efficiency V23 +50 Safety V23 +21 Practicality Pajero Sport +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

V23

Performance 41/100
Efficiency 99/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 60/100

Pajero Sport

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index iCAUR V23 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 65 pts for Pajero Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, V23 leads. However, Pajero Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Pajero Sport vs V23 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.