Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

2.4L DI-DC 8-speed A/T 4X4 Exceed Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 904,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 133 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
Volkswagen T-Roc in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 140kW 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 320 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Volkswagen T-Roc: the short answer

Pajero Sport and T-Roc are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

T-Roc starts ZAR 141,090 cheaper Pajero Sport from ZAR 789,990 · T-Roc from ZAR 648,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Pajero Sport T-Roc
Maximum Power Pajero Sport133 kW @ 3500 rpm T-Roc140 kW
Maximum Torque Pajero Sport430 Nm @ 2500 rpm T-Roc320 Nm
Engine Size Pajero Sport2442 cc T-Roc2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Pajero Sport12.3 km/l T-Roc15.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Pajero Sport218 mm T-Roc168 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Pajero Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

T-Roc

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Pajero Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

T-Roc

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Pajero Sport T-Roc
Model Introduced Year 2017 2021
Generation Third-generation Pajero Sport, 2025 facelift Current first-generation T-Roc remains on sale while the second generation is prepared for South Africa
Facelift History South African facelift launched in May 2025. Volkswagen has confirmed the all-new second-generation T-Roc for the second half of 2026; local derivatives and prices are still pending
Facelift Launched Since Current specification Volkswagen has confirmed the all-new second-generation T-Roc for the second half of 2026; local derivatives and prices are still pending
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active published
Segment Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red, Orange
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - 4x4 configuration for the local line-up
Tare Mass Kg - 1400 kg
Spec Pajero Sport T-Roc
Length 4825 mm 4234 mm
Width 1815 mm 1819 mm
Height 1805 mm 1573 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2593 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 218 mm 168 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 190 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 193 l 392 l
Kerb Weight 2080 kg 1400 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2775 kg 2020 kg
Payload Capacity 695 kg -
Towing Capacity 2850 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1022 mm -
Rear Headroom 957 mm -
Front Legroom 1067 mm -
Rear Legroom 880 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Pajero Sport and T-Roc comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Pajero Sport 65 vs T-Roc 64.

Efficiency index: Pajero Sport 49 vs T-Roc 61.

Safety-equipment index: Pajero Sport 72 vs T-Roc 99.

Practicality index: Pajero Sport 71 vs T-Roc 58.

Ownership-cover index: Pajero Sport not separately scored vs T-Roc 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

T-Roc leads by 2 points

Pajero Sport and T-Roc are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 89% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

T-Roc

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Ownership 43
Performance 64
Efficiency 61
Safety 99
Practicality 58
Ownership 43
Leads by 2 points
65
#2

Pajero Sport

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 65
Efficiency 49
Safety 72
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Pajero Sport +1 Efficiency T-Roc +12 Safety T-Roc +27 Practicality Pajero Sport +13

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

T-Roc

Performance 64/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 43/100

Pajero Sport

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Volkswagen T-Roc leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 65 pts for Pajero Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, T-Roc leads. However, Pajero Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
Pajero Sport vs Land Cruiser FJ →
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Pajero Sport vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
Pajero Sport vs E5 Electric →
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
Pajero Sport vs ATTO 3 →
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
VS
H6 GT
H6 GT
Pajero Sport vs H6 GT →
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
VS
Tank 300
Tank 300
Pajero Sport vs Tank 300 →
T-Roc
T-Roc
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
T-Roc vs Land Cruiser FJ →
T-Roc
T-Roc
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
T-Roc vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →

Pajero Sport vs T-Roc questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.