iCAUR 03T vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

iCAUR 03T in South Africa

iCAUR 03T

2WD Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 639,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ Not applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

2.4L DI-DC 8-speed A/T 4X4 Exceed Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 904,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 133 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

iCAUR 03T vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: the short answer

03T has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Pajero Sport remains close.

03T starts ZAR 150,090 cheaper 03T from ZAR 639,900 · Pajero Sport from ZAR 789,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 03T Pajero Sport
Maximum Power 03T135 kW Pajero Sport133 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque 03T220 Nm Pajero Sport430 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size 03TNot applicable — battery electric vehicle Pajero Sport2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 03TNot applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l Pajero Sport12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 03T190 mm Pajero Sport218 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

03T

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Pajero Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

03T

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Pajero Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 03T Pajero Sport
Model Introduced Year 2026 2017
Generation South African May 2026 local specification sheet for the current 03T generation. Third-generation Pajero Sport, 2025 facelift
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Published active
Segment Electric SUV Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Passenger vehicle
Facelift History - South African facelift launched in May 2025.
Facelift Launched Since - Current specification
Facelift Version Ending - Current
Spec 03T Pajero Sport
Length 4433 mm 4825 mm
Width 1916 mm 1815 mm
Height 1741 mm 1805 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 190 mm 218 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 165 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity Not applicable — battery electric vehicle 68 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 L rear seats up; 1,238 L with rear seats folded; 40 L rear storage box 193 l
Kerb Weight 1600–1950 kg 2080 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2173 kg 2775 kg
Payload Capacity 350–650 kg 695 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm 1022 mm
Rear Headroom 990 mm 957 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1067 mm
Rear Legroom 970 mm 880 mm
Towing Capacity - 2850 kg

In depth: how these cars differ

This 03T and Pajero Sport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 03T 51 vs Pajero Sport 65.

Efficiency index: 03T 99 vs Pajero Sport 49.

Safety-equipment index: 03T 93 vs Pajero Sport 72.

Practicality index: 03T 64 vs Pajero Sport 71.

Ownership-cover index: 03T not separately scored vs Pajero Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

03T leads by 10 points

03T has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Pajero Sport remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 67% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

03T

67% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 99 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 99
Safety 93
Practicality 64
Leads by 10 points
65
#2

Pajero Sport

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 65
Efficiency 49
Safety 72
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Pajero Sport +14 Efficiency 03T +50 Safety 03T +21 Practicality Pajero Sport +7

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

03T

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 99/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 64/100

Pajero Sport

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index iCAUR 03T leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 65 pts for Pajero Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 03T leads. However, Pajero Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

03T vs Pajero Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.