Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody Discontinued model
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel 7-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 529,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 200 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab: the short answer

NP300 Hardbody has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Triton Single Cab remains close.

Recorded price context NP300 Hardbody: last listed from ZAR 349,900 · Triton Single Cab: current from ZAR 499,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification NP300 Hardbody Triton Single Cab
Maximum Power NP300 Hardbody98 kW @ 3600 rpm Triton Single Cab81 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque NP300 Hardbody304 Nm Triton Single Cab200 Nm @ 1000-3750 rpm
Engine Size NP300 Hardbody2488 cc Triton Single Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy NP300 Hardbody11.4 km/l Triton Single Cab12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance NP300 Hardbody215 mm Triton Single Cab200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Nissan NP300 Hardbody 2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Triton Single Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Triton Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec NP300 Hardbody Triton Single Cab
Model Introduced Year 2008 2024
Generation Long-running model with proven commercial reliability Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History Updated over the years with improved safety and features Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024.
Tare Mass Kg 1395 kg -
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Single-cab pickup
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed One-ton single-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Light commercial vehicle
Spec NP300 Hardbody Triton Single Cab
Length 4875 mm 5320 mm
Width 1760 mm 1865 mm
Height 1655 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 2500 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 215 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 75 l
Kerb Weight 1395 kg 1625 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2400 kg 2570 kg
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 6.35 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 185 mm
Boot/Cargo Space Not confirmed 1904 l
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 945 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 1 rows
Doors Not confirmed 2 doors
Front Headroom Not confirmed 1007 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1059 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This NP300 Hardbody and Triton Single Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: NP300 Hardbody 50 vs Triton Single Cab 34.

Efficiency index: NP300 Hardbody 46 vs Triton Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: NP300 Hardbody 68 vs Triton Single Cab 32.

Practicality index: NP300 Hardbody 73 vs Triton Single Cab 72.

Ownership-cover index: NP300 Hardbody 43 vs Triton Single Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

NP300 Hardbody leads by 11 points

NP300 Hardbody has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Triton Single Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 57 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 77% source coverage
57
#1 Evidence leader

NP300 Hardbody

77% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 73 Check Ownership 43
Performance 50
Efficiency 46
Safety 68
Practicality 73
Ownership 43
Leads by 11 points
46
#2

Triton Single Cab

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 72 Check Safety 32
Performance 34
Efficiency 49
Safety 32
Practicality 72
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance NP300 Hardbody +16 Efficiency Triton Single Cab +3 Safety NP300 Hardbody +36 Practicality NP300 Hardbody +1

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 68/100
Practicality 73/100
Ownership 43/100

Triton Single Cab

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 72/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Nissan NP300 Hardbody leads the specification evidence index with 57 pts vs 46 pts for Triton Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, NP300 Hardbody leads. However, Triton Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

NP300 Hardbody vs Triton Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.