Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs GWM P300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody Discontinued model
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel 7-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 529,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
VS
GWM P300 in South Africa

GWM P300

2.4T LT 2WD 9AT Diesel Current
ZAR 599,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 480 Nm ⛽ 13.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs GWM P300: the short answer

P300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while NP300 Hardbody remains close.

Recorded price context NP300 Hardbody: last listed from ZAR 349,900 · P300: current from ZAR 414,950

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification NP300 Hardbody P300
Maximum Power NP300 Hardbody98 kW @ 3600 rpm P300135 kW
Maximum Torque NP300 Hardbody304 Nm P300480 Nm
Engine Size NP300 Hardbody2488 cc P3002400 cc
Combined Fuel Economy NP300 Hardbody11.4 km/l P30013.5 km/l
Ground Clearance NP300 Hardbody215 mm P300224 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Nissan NP300 Hardbody 2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

P300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

P300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec NP300 Hardbody P300
Model Introduced Year 2008 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Long-running model with proven commercial reliability Current South African P300 listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Updated over the years with improved safety and features Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Tare Mass Kg 1395 kg 2070 kg
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Double-cab pickup
Body Type Cab Not confirmed Pickup
Color Note Not confirmed Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.4T LT 2WD 9AT
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed published
Segment Not confirmed Pickup
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Pickup
Spec NP300 Hardbody P300
Length 4875 mm 5416 mm
Width 1760 mm 1934 mm
Height 1655 mm 1886 mm
Wheelbase 2500 mm 3230 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 215 mm 224 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 78 l
Kerb Weight 1395 kg 2070 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2400 kg 3120 kg
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 3000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m -
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 1050 kg
Doors Not confirmed 4 doors

In depth: how these cars differ

This NP300 Hardbody and P300 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: NP300 Hardbody 50 vs P300 71.

Efficiency index: NP300 Hardbody 46 vs P300 57.

Safety-equipment index: NP300 Hardbody 68 vs P300 not separately scored.

Practicality index: NP300 Hardbody 73 vs P300 82.

Ownership-cover index: NP300 Hardbody 43 vs P300 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

P300 leads by 13 points

P300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while NP300 Hardbody remains close.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 63% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

P300

63% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 82 Check Efficiency 57
Performance 71
Efficiency 57
Practicality 82
Ownership 65
Leads by 13 points
57
#2

NP300 Hardbody

77% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 73 Check Ownership 43
Performance 50
Efficiency 46
Safety 68
Practicality 73
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance P300 +21 Efficiency P300 +11 Practicality P300 +9 Ownership P300 +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

P300

Performance 71/100
Efficiency 57/100
Practicality 82/100
Ownership 65/100

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 68/100
Practicality 73/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM P300 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 57 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, P300 leads. However, NP300 Hardbody may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

NP300 Hardbody vs P300 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.