MG HS vs Hyundai Kona

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Kona Discontinued model
MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
VS
Hyundai Kona in South Africa

Hyundai Kona

1.0T DCT Executive Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 565,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 15.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

MG HS vs Hyundai Kona: the short answer

HS and Kona are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context HS: current from ZAR 499,900 · Kona: last listed from ZAR 459,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification HS Kona
Maximum Power HS170 kW Kona88 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque HS370 Nm Kona172 Nm @ 1500 rpm
Engine Size HS1986 cc Kona998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy HS11.63 km/l Kona15.5 km/l
Ground Clearance HS145 mm Kona165 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Kona 1.0T DCT Executive

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Kona

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Kona

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec HS Kona
Model Introduced Year 2025 2018
Generation Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains. Second generation Kona on Hyundai's K2 GEN platform; the design is more conservative than the first gen but better resolved
Facelift History Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active. Second generation launched globally in 2023 and brought to SA; softened styling compared to the sharper first gen, improved interior quality and tech
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style Five-door mid-size SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2025 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment Mid-size SUV Not confirmed
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg - 1460 kg
Spec HS Kona
Length 4655 mm 4355 mm
Width 1890 mm 1825 mm
Height 1655 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase 2765 mm 2660 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 145 mm 165 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 507 l 466 l
Kerb Weight 1590 kg 1460 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg Not confirmed
Payload Capacity 475 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 750 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.65 m Not confirmed
Front Headroom 968 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 964 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1044 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 980 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This HS and Kona comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: HS 70 vs Kona 40.

Efficiency index: HS 46 vs Kona 62.

Safety-equipment index: HS 98 vs Kona 87.

Practicality index: HS 57 vs Kona 67.

Ownership-cover index: HS not separately scored vs Kona 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

HS leads by 5 points

HS and Kona are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 78% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Leads by 5 points
64
#2

Kona

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 67
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +30 Efficiency Kona +16 Safety HS +11 Practicality Kona +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

Kona

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG HS leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 64 pts for Kona

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, HS leads. However, Kona may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

HS
HS
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
HS vs C5 SHS →
HS
HS
VS
HR-V
HR-V
HS vs HR-V →
HS
HS
VS
Destinator
Destinator
HS vs Destinator →
HS
HS
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
HS vs Scorpio-N →
HS
HS
VS
Duster
Duster
HS vs Duster →
HS
HS
VS
XUV700
XUV700
HS vs XUV700 →
Kona
KonaDiscontinued
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
Kona vs C5 SHS →
Kona
KonaDiscontinued
VS
HR-V
HR-V
Kona vs HR-V →

HS vs Kona questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.