Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs GWM P500

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,211,910 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 450 Nm at 1,600-2,600 r/min Nm
VS
GWM P500 in South Africa

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 255 kW 🔧 648 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance P500
Fuel Economy P500
🛡 Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
📦 Practicality P500
🔑 Ownership P500
P500 starts ZAR 1211910 cheaper D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 from ZAR 1,211,910 · P500 from ZAR 799,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 P500
Engine Power 140 kW at 3,600 r/min kW 255 kW
Torque 450 Nm at 1,600-2,600 r/min Nm 648 Nm
Engine Size 2,999 cc 2000 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 10.2 km/l
Ground Clearance 266 mm 224 mm
Boot / Load Bay 1,495 mm Load box with spray-on liner, loadbox light and tailgate step
Airbags Front, front side, curtain, driver knee and far-side airbags Front dual, front side, curtain and front centre airbags
Kerb Weight 2,160 kg tare mass kg 2810 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 years / 120,000 km with roadside assistance 5 Years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 has a slight advantage, but P500 remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance P500 +23 pts
Efficiency P500 +3 pts
Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +85 pts
Practicality P500 +16 pts
Ownership P500 +10 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: General Use

P500

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

P500

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 P500
Model Introduced Year 2023 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Seventh-generation D-Max; MY26 facelift; AT35 conversion Current South African P500 listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History MY26 mid-cycle facelift announced 3 June 2026 Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since June 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup Double-cab pickup
Model Year MY26 2026
Production Status On sale published
Segment Extreme-terrain lifestyle pickup Pickup
Vehicle Type Light commercial vehicle Pickup
Model Code M260RY7 -
Body Type Cab - Pickup
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT
Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 P500
Ground Clearance 266 mm 224 mm
Wheelbase 3,125 mm 3350 mm
Length 5,333 mm 5445 mm
Width 2,040 mm 1991 mm
Height 1,875 mm 1924 mm
Kerb Weight 2,160 kg tare mass kg 2810 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 2,880 kg GVM kg 3495 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Towing Capacity 750 kg unbraked / 3,500 kg braked kg 3500 kg
Front Track Width 1,695 mm -
Rear Track Width 1,695 mm -
Turning Radius 12.5 m turning circle m -
Load Bed Length 1,495 mm Load box with spray-on liner, loadbox light and tailgate step
Load Bed Width 1,530 mm -
Number of Doors 4 4
Max Payload 660 kg 685 kg
Doors 4 4
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 litres l 80 l
Gross Combined Mass Kg 5780 kg -
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2,880 kg GVM kg 3495 kg
Ground Clearance Max 266 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance Min 266 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 266 mm 224 mm
Height Mm 1,875 mm 1924 mm
Length Mm 5,333 mm 5445 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 1,495 mm Load box with spray-on liner, loadbox light and tailgate step
Loadbox Width Mm 1530 mm -
Payload Kg 660 kg 685 kg
Rear Overhang Mm 1318 mm -
Tare Mass Kg 2,160 kg tare mass kg 2810 kg
Turning Circle 12.5 m turning circle m -
Turning Circle M 12.5 m turning circle m -
Width Mm 2,040 mm 1991 mm
Boot Space 1,495 mm Load box with spray-on liner, loadbox light and tailgate step
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - -
Boot Volume 1,495 mm Load box with spray-on liner, loadbox light and tailgate step
Cargo Volume 1,495 mm Load box with spray-on liner, loadbox light and tailgate step

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads by 8 points

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 has a slight advantage, but P500 remains highly competitive.

Winner 69 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 75% confidence
69
#1 Winner

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

75% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 94
Practicality 63
Ownership 55
Leads by 8 points
61
#2

P500

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Safety 9
Performance 98
Efficiency 50
Safety 9
Practicality 79
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance P500 +23 Efficiency P500 +3 Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +85 Practicality P500 +16 Ownership P500 +10

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 63/100
Ownership 55/100

P500

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 9/100
Practicality 79/100
Ownership 65/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 wins with 69 pts vs 61 pts for P500

In structured scoring, D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, P500 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 47 vs P500 50. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 94, P500 9. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 55, P500 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 63, P500 79. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 75, P500 98. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and P500 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 75 vs 98.

Efficiency: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 47 vs 50.

Safety: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 94 vs 9.

Practicality: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 63 vs 79.

Ownership: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 55 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 the advantage in this comparison.