Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,211,910 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 450 Nm at 1,600-2,600 r/min Nm
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
🛡 Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
🔑 Ownership D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab starts ZAR 1211910 cheaper D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 from ZAR 1,211,910 · Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab from ZAR 801,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Engine Power 140 kW at 3,600 r/min kW 202 kW
Torque 450 Nm at 1,600-2,600 r/min Nm 381 Nm
Engine Size 2,999 cc 3956 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 13 km/l
Ground Clearance 266 mm 235 mm
Boot / Load Bay 1,495 mm Double-cab load box cargo area
Airbags Front, front side, curtain, driver knee and far-side airbags 2
Kerb Weight 2,160 kg tare mass kg 2050 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 years / 120,000 km with roadside assistance 3 years / 100 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +3 pts
Efficiency Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +2 pts
Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +49 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +20 pts
Ownership D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +11 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2023 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Seventh-generation D-Max; MY26 facelift; AT35 conversion Current South African Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History MY26 mid-cycle facelift announced 3 June 2026 Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since June 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup Pickup
Model Year MY26 2026
Production Status On sale published
Segment Extreme-terrain lifestyle pickup Pickup
Vehicle Type Light commercial vehicle Pickup
Model Code M260RY7 -
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Ground Clearance 266 mm 235 mm
Wheelbase 3,125 mm 3085 mm
Length 5,333 mm 5270 mm
Width 2,040 mm 1855 mm
Height 1,875 mm 1855 mm
Kerb Weight 2,160 kg tare mass kg 2050 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 2,880 kg GVM kg 3100 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Towing Capacity 750 kg unbraked / 3,500 kg braked kg 3500 kg
Front Track Width 1,695 mm -
Rear Track Width 1,695 mm -
Turning Radius 12.5 m turning circle m 6.4 m
Load Bed Length 1,495 mm Double-cab load box cargo area
Load Bed Width 1,530 mm -
Number of Doors 4 4
Max Payload 660 kg -
Doors 4 4
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 litres l 87 l
Gross Combined Mass Kg 5780 kg -
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2,880 kg GVM kg 3100 kg
Ground Clearance Max 266 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance Min 266 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 266 mm 235 mm
Height Mm 1,875 mm 1855 mm
Length Mm 5,333 mm 5270 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 1,495 mm Double-cab load box cargo area
Loadbox Width Mm 1530 mm -
Payload Kg 660 kg -
Rear Overhang Mm 1318 mm -
Tare Mass Kg 2,160 kg tare mass kg 2050 kg
Turning Circle 12.5 m turning circle m 6.4 m
Turning Circle M 12.5 m turning circle m 6.4 m
Width Mm 2,040 mm 1855 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded - -
Boot Volume 1,495 mm Double-cab load box cargo area
Cargo Volume 1,495 mm Double-cab load box cargo area
Boot Space 1,495 mm Double-cab load box cargo area
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads by 7 points

Both D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 69 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 75% confidence
69
#1 Winner

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

75% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 94
Practicality 63
Ownership 55
Leads by 7 points
62
#2

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

89% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 83 Check Ownership 44
Performance 78
Efficiency 49
Safety 45
Practicality 83
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +3 Efficiency Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +2 Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +49 Practicality Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +20 Ownership D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +11

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 63/100
Ownership 55/100

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 83/100
Ownership 44/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 wins with 69 pts vs 62 pts for Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

In structured scoring, D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 47 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 49. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 94, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 45. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 55, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 44. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 63, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 83. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 75, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 78. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 75 vs 78.

Efficiency: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 47 vs 49.

Safety: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 94 vs 45.

Practicality: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 63 vs 83.

Ownership: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 scores 55 vs 44.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 the advantage in this comparison.