Changan CS75 Pro vs MG HS

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Changan CS75 Pro in South Africa

Changan CS75 Pro

1.5T AT 5S CE Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 474,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 13.33 km/l
VS
MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan CS75 Pro vs MG HS: the short answer

CS75 Pro and HS are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

CS75 Pro starts ZAR 70,000 cheaper CS75 Pro from ZAR 429,900 · HS from ZAR 499,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CS75 Pro HS
Maximum Power CS75 Pro138 kW HS170 kW
Maximum Torque CS75 Pro300 Nm HS370 Nm
Engine Size CS75 Pro1494 cc HS1986 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CS75 Pro13.33 km/l HS11.63 km/l
Ground Clearance CS75 ProNot Officially Disclosed HS145 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CS75 Pro

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

CS75 Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CS75 Pro HS
Model Introduced Year 2025 2025
Generation Current South African CS75 Pro generation with two equipment grades and two seating configurations. Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains.
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the present CS75 Pro range entered local sale. Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active.
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2025
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style SUV Five-door mid-size SUV
Model Year 2026 2025
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV Mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger car SUV
Spec CS75 Pro HS
Length 4730 mm 4655 mm
Width 1870 mm 1890 mm
Height 1720 mm 1655 mm
Wheelbase 2786 mm 2765 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 145 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 620 l 507 l
Kerb Weight 1550 kg 1590 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1925 kg 2065 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 475 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.65 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 968 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 964 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1044 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 980 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CS75 Pro and HS comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CS75 Pro 59 vs HS 70.

Efficiency index: CS75 Pro 52 vs HS 46.

Safety-equipment index: CS75 Pro 76 vs HS 98.

Practicality index: CS75 Pro 79 vs HS 57.

Ownership-cover index: CS75 Pro not separately scored vs HS not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

HS leads by 2 points

CS75 Pro and HS are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 78% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Leads by 2 points
67
#2

CS75 Pro

65% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 79 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 59
Efficiency 52
Safety 76
Practicality 79
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +11 Efficiency CS75 Pro +6 Safety HS +22 Practicality CS75 Pro +22

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

CS75 Pro

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 79/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG HS leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 67 pts for CS75 Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, HS leads. However, CS75 Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CS75 Pro vs HS questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.