Changan CS75 Pro vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Changan CS75 Pro in South Africa

Changan CS75 Pro

1.5T AT 5S CE Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 474,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 13.33 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Exceed 1.5L CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 141 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan CS75 Pro vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport: the short answer

CS75 Pro has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Outlander Sport remains close.

CS75 Pro starts ZAR 20,090 cheaper CS75 Pro from ZAR 429,900 · Outlander Sport from ZAR 449,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CS75 Pro Outlander Sport
Maximum Power CS75 Pro138 kW Outlander Sport77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CS75 Pro300 Nm Outlander Sport141 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size CS75 Pro1494 cc Outlander Sport1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CS75 Pro13.33 km/l Outlander Sport16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance CS75 ProNot Officially Disclosed Outlander Sport193 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CS75 Pro

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Outlander Sport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CS75 Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Outlander Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CS75 Pro Outlander Sport
Model Introduced Year 2025 2025
Generation Current South African CS75 Pro generation with two equipment grades and two seating configurations. First South African Outlander Sport generation, Mitsubishi Xforce architecture
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the present CS75 Pro range entered local sale. Introduced locally in January 2025 and replaced ASX.
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger car Passenger vehicle
Spec CS75 Pro Outlander Sport
Length 4730 mm 4390 mm
Width 1870 mm 1810 mm
Height 1720 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase 2786 mm 2650 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 193 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 620 l 480 l
Kerb Weight 1550 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1925 kg 1730 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 480 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.2 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 950 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 880 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 370 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CS75 Pro and Outlander Sport comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CS75 Pro 59 vs Outlander Sport 30.

Efficiency index: CS75 Pro 52 vs Outlander Sport 62.

Safety-equipment index: CS75 Pro 76 vs Outlander Sport 73.

Practicality index: CS75 Pro 79 vs Outlander Sport 67.

Ownership-cover index: CS75 Pro not separately scored vs Outlander Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CS75 Pro leads by 10 points

CS75 Pro has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Outlander Sport remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 65% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

CS75 Pro

65% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 79 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 59
Efficiency 52
Safety 76
Practicality 79
Leads by 10 points
57
#2

Outlander Sport

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 62
Safety 73
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CS75 Pro +29 Efficiency Outlander Sport +10 Safety CS75 Pro +3 Practicality CS75 Pro +12

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CS75 Pro

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 79/100

Outlander Sport

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Changan CS75 Pro leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 57 pts for Outlander Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CS75 Pro leads. However, Outlander Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CS75 Pro vs Outlander Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.