Suzuki Across vs GWM H2

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM H2 Discontinued model
Suzuki Across in South Africa

Suzuki Across

1.5 GLX 6AT Petrol Mild Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 464,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 76 kW 🔧 137 Nm ⛽ 18.9 km/l
VS
GWM H2 in South Africa

GWM H2

1.5T LT Petrol 6-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 339,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Across vs GWM H2: the short answer

Across has a modest catalogue-index lead, while H2 remains close.

Recorded price context Across: current from ZAR 349,900 · H2: last listed from ZAR 299,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Across H2
Maximum Power Across75.8 kW @ 6000 rpm H2110 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Across136.8 Nm @ 4400 rpm H2210 Nm
Engine Size Across1462 cc H21497 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Across18.9 km/l H27.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Across210 mm H2175 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for GWM H2 1.5T LT

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Across

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

H2

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Across

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

H2

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Across H2
Model Introduced Year 2026 2017
Generation First South African generation of the current Across First generation Haval H2 in SA, on sale 2017-2022. Discontinued in favour of the Jolion, which used a more modern platform and powertrain.
Facelift History All-new March 2026 South African launch model; no facelift yet H2 received a mid-cycle update in 2019 that brought minor exterior styling changes, improved infotainment software and refinements to the DCT calibration. Updates continued through the model life to address recurring DCT issues, with the final 2022 specification being notably improved over the original 2017 launch model.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style Five-door compact SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status On sale Not confirmed
Segment C-segment family SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 1200-1250 kg Not confirmed
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Not confirmed
Spec Across H2
Length 4360 mm 4290 mm
Width 1795 mm 1800 mm
Height 1655 mm 1645 mm
Wheelbase 2600 mm 2560 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 175 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 52 l
Boot/Cargo Space 333 l Not confirmed
Payload Capacity 460 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.4 m
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 1800 kg
Front Headroom - 990 mm
Rear Headroom - 960 mm
Front Legroom - 1040 mm
Rear Legroom - 870 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Across and H2 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Across 34 vs H2 45.

Efficiency index: Across 76 vs H2 35.

Safety-equipment index: Across 91 vs H2 72.

Practicality index: Across 62 vs H2 66.

Ownership-cover index: Across not separately scored vs H2 44.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Across leads by 10 points

Across has a modest catalogue-index lead, while H2 remains close.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 73% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

Across

73% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 76
Safety 91
Practicality 62
Leads by 10 points
54
#2

H2

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 35
Performance 45
Efficiency 35
Safety 72
Practicality 66
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance H2 +11 Efficiency Across +41 Safety Across +19 Practicality H2 +4

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Across

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 76/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 62/100

H2

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 35/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 44/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Suzuki Across leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 54 pts for H2

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Across leads. However, H2 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

Across
Across
VS
Urban Cruiser
Urban Cruiser
Across vs Urban Cruiser →
Across
Across
VS
Sonet
Sonet
Across vs Sonet →
Across
Across
VS
J5
J5
Across vs J5 →
Across
Across
VS
C5
C5
Across vs C5 →
Across
Across
VS
Starlet Cross
Starlet Cross
Across vs Starlet Cross →
Across
Across
VS
Fronx
Fronx
Across vs Fronx →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Urban Cruiser
Urban Cruiser
H2 vs Urban Cruiser →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Sonet
Sonet
H2 vs Sonet →

Across vs H2 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.