GWM Tank 300 vs Renault Trafic Passenger

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Plug-in Hybrid 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 35.7 km/l
VS
Renault Trafic Passenger in South Africa

Renault Trafic Passenger

Techno+ Diesel 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,049,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM Tank 300 vs Renault Trafic Passenger: the short answer

Tank 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Trafic Passenger.

Tank 300 starts ZAR 280,099 cheaper Tank 300 from ZAR 699,900 · Trafic Passenger from ZAR 979,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Tank 300 Trafic Passenger
Maximum Power Tank 300240 kW @ 5500 rpm Trafic Passenger125 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Tank 300750 Nm Trafic Passenger380 Nm @ 1500 rpm
Engine Size Tank 3001999 cc Trafic Passenger1997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Tank 30035.7 km/l Trafic Passenger13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Tank 300224 mm Trafic Passenger199 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Renault Trafic Passenger

Techno+

Hagalu editorial rating
4.4/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Trafic Passenger

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Tank 300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Trafic Passenger

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Tank 300 Trafic Passenger
360 Degree Camera Yes Not Available
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Not Available
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Not Available
Around View Monitor Yes Not Available
Attention Assist Yes -
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes Standard
Automatic High Beam Yes -
Auto Highbeam Yes Not Available
Auto Lights Yes -
Auto Park Assist No -
Auto Wipers Yes Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes Standard
Blind Spot Warning Yes Standard
Cruise Control Yes Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert Yes Standard
Eco Mode Yes -
Emergency Braking Yes -
EV Mode Yes -
Forward Collision Warning Yes Standard
Front Camera Yes -
Lane Departure Warning Yes Standard
Lane Keep Assist Yes Standard
Park Assist Yes Not Available
Parking Distance Sensors Front and Rear -
Parking Sensor Front and Rear -
Parking Sensors Front and Rear Front and Rear
Pre-Collision System Yes -
Rain Sensor Wipers Yes -
Rear View Camera Yes Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes Not Available
Rear Parking Sensors Yes Standard
Rear View Camera Yes -
Reverse Camera Yes Standard
Reverse Camera Type Yes -
Reversing Camera Yes -
Sport Mode Yes -
Surround View Camera Yes Not Available
Traffic Sign Recognition Yes Not Available
Spec Tank 300 Trafic Passenger
4WD Engagement Available Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Yes Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Yes Not Applicable
4WD Selector Confirmed 4WD derivative Not Applicable
Automatic Shift Paddles Yes Not Available
Axle Layout AWD 4x2
Clutch Type Torque Converter Not Applicable
Differential Lock Yes Not Applicable
Drive Mode Selector 4WD/off-road drive mode support -
Drivetrain All Wheel Drive (Hi4-T Hybrid) Front-Wheel Drive
Drivetrain Layout Front Engine Four Wheel Drive Front Engine, Front-Wheel Drive
Engine Position Front Transverse -
Final Drive Ratio 3.73 Not Available
Number of Gears 8 9
Gear Shift Indicator Yes Standard
Gear Shift Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox 8-Speed Automatic 9-Speed EAG9 Automatic
Gearbox Type 8-Speed Automatic Torque Converter Automatic
LSD Available Yes Not Applicable
Low Range Available where 4WD low range is fitted Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Yes Not Available
Reverse Gear Warning Yes -
Steering Turns Lock to Lock 14.7:1 -
Transfer Case Yes Not Applicable
Transmission Speeds 8 9
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Front Differential Lock Yes Not Applicable
Rear Differential Lock Yes Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Tank 300 and Trafic Passenger comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Tank 300 98 vs Trafic Passenger 55.

Efficiency index: Tank 300 97 vs Trafic Passenger 55.

Safety-equipment index: Tank 300 100 vs Trafic Passenger 90.

Practicality index: Tank 300 72 vs Trafic Passenger 88.

Ownership-cover index: Tank 300 65 vs Trafic Passenger not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tank 300 leads by 15 points

Tank 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Trafic Passenger.

Evidence leader 88 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 99% source coverage
88
#1 Evidence leader

Tank 300

99% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 98
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 72
Ownership 65
Leads by 15 points
73
#2

Trafic Passenger

81% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Performance 55
Performance 55
Efficiency 55
Safety 90
Practicality 88
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +43 Efficiency Tank 300 +42 Safety Tank 300 +10 Practicality Trafic Passenger +16

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tank 300

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 72/100
Ownership 65/100

Trafic Passenger

Performance 55/100
Efficiency 55/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 88/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM Tank 300 leads the specification evidence index with 88 pts vs 73 pts for Trafic Passenger

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tank 300 leads. However, Trafic Passenger may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tank 300 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
Everest
Everest
Tank 300 vs Everest →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
X1
X1
Tank 300 vs X1 →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
Tank 300 vs H6 GT PHEV →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
X2
X2
Tank 300 vs X2 →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
Tayron
Tayron
Tank 300 vs Tayron →
Trafic Passenger
Trafic Passenger
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Trafic Passenger vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
Trafic Passenger
Trafic Passenger
VS
Everest
Everest
Trafic Passenger vs Everest →

Tank 300 vs Trafic Passenger questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.