Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupé vs BMW X4

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupé Discontinued model
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupé in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupé

6.7 V12 Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
No longer sold new historical price not confirmed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 338 kW 🔧 720 Nm ⛽ 6.76 km/l
VS
BMW X4 in South Africa

BMW X4

M40i Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,600,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupé vs BMW X4: the short answer

X4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Phantom Coupé remains close.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Phantom Coupé X4
Maximum Power Phantom Coupé338 kW @ 5350 rpm X4285 kW
Maximum Torque Phantom Coupé720 Nm @ 3500 rpm X4500 Nm
Engine Size Phantom Coupé6749 cc X42998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Phantom Coupé6.76 km/l X412.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Phantom Coupé132 mm X4140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupé

6.7 V12

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BMW X4

M40i

Hagalu editorial rating
4.0/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Phantom Coupé

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

X4

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Phantom Coupé

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

X4

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Phantom Coupé X4
Generation Phantom VII two-door Coupé; the archived profile uses the exact Series II World specification listed for South Africa in 2016. Five-door coupé-style SUV from the established X4 generation, separate from X3 and without a current full-M derivative.
Facelift History Phantom Series II was introduced in 2012; Phantom Coupé production ended in 2016. Current South African X4 listing retained on BMW’s live range; current exact identities are xDrive20d and M40i.
Facelift Launched Since 2012 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending 2016 Current
Body Style Coupe SUV
Model Year 2016 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment Ultra-luxury grand tourer Premium SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger car Car
Model Introduced Year Not confirmed 2018
Spec Phantom Coupé X4
Length 5612 mm 1 mm
Width 1987 mm 1 mm
Height 1598 mm 1 mm
Wheelbase 3320 mm 1 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 132 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 132 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 395 l 472 l
Kerb Weight 2580 kg 1555 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3050 kg 2060 kg
Payload Capacity 470 kg 452 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.55 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1021 mm 992 mm
Rear Headroom 943 mm 941 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1038 mm
Rear Legroom 936 mm 883 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Phantom Coupé and X4 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Phantom Coupé 95 vs X4 97.

Efficiency index: Phantom Coupé 31 vs X4 57.

Safety-equipment index: Phantom Coupé 86 vs X4 92.

Practicality index: Phantom Coupé 54 vs X4 60.

Ownership-cover index: Phantom Coupé not separately scored vs X4 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

X4 leads by 9 points

X4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Phantom Coupé remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

X4

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 97 Check Efficiency 57
Performance 97
Efficiency 57
Safety 92
Practicality 60
Leads by 9 points
69
#2

Phantom Coupé

73% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 95 Check Efficiency 31
Performance 95
Efficiency 31
Safety 86
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance X4 +2 Efficiency X4 +26 Safety X4 +6 Practicality X4 +6

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

X4

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 60/100

Phantom Coupé

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 31/100
Safety 86/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW X4 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 69 pts for Phantom Coupé

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, X4 leads. However, Phantom Coupé may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Phantom Coupé vs X4 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.