Lexus NX vs BMW X1

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Lexus NX in South Africa

Lexus NX

NX 350 F SPORT Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,276,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 205 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
BMW X1 in South Africa

BMW X1

M35i xDrive Petrol 7-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,182,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 233 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Lexus NX vs BMW X1: the short answer

NX and X1 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

X1 starts ZAR 269,200 cheaper NX from ZAR 1,074,200 · X1 from ZAR 805,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification NX X1
Maximum Power NX205 kW @ 6000 rpm X1233 kW
Maximum Torque NX430 Nm X1400 Nm @ 2000-4500 rpm
Engine Size NX2400 cc X11998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy NX12.3 km/l X112.5 km/l
Ground Clearance NX195 mm X1190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NX

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

X1

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

NX

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

X1

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec NX X1
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Second-generation Lexus NX mid-size luxury SUV Third-generation U11 BMW X1, sharing its architecture and cabin concept with the battery-electric iX1.
Facelift History Current South African range includes petrol, self-charging hybrid and plug-in-hybrid derivatives U11 is the current South African X1 generation; no local facelift has been announced.
Facelift Launched Since Current South African range includes petrol, self-charging hybrid and plug-in-hybrid derivatives Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Luxury SUV Premium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1760-1860 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Car
Spec NX X1
Length 4660 mm 4505 mm
Width 1865 mm 1845 mm
Height 1670 mm 1622 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 2692 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 195 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 54 l
Boot/Cargo Space 520 l 540 l
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2370 kg 2240 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 5.8 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 170 mm
Kerb Weight - 1740 kg
Payload Capacity - 575 kg
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1001 mm
Rear Headroom - 986 mm
Front Legroom - 1040 mm
Rear Legroom - 925 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This NX and X1 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: NX 86 vs X1 90.

Efficiency index: NX 49 vs X1 49.

Safety-equipment index: NX 93 vs X1 92.

Practicality index: NX 65 vs X1 64.

Ownership-cover index: NX not separately scored vs X1 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

X1 leads by 1 points

NX and X1 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 83% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

X1

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 90
Efficiency 49
Safety 92
Practicality 64
Leads by 1 points
75
#2

NX

70% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 86
Efficiency 49
Safety 93
Practicality 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance X1 +4 Efficiency Level Safety NX +1 Practicality NX +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

X1

Performance 90/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 64/100

NX

Performance 86/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW X1 leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 75 pts for NX

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, X1 leads. However, NX may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

NX
NX
VS
UX
UX
NX vs UX →
NX
NX
VS
GLA
GLA
NX vs GLA →
NX
NX
VS
D90
D90
NX vs D90 →
NX
NX
VS
Land Cruiser Prado
Land Cruiser Prado
NX vs Land Cruiser Prado →
NX
NX
VS
Land Cruiser 76
Land Cruiser 76
NX vs Land Cruiser 76 →
NX
NX
VS
Deepal S07
Deepal S07
NX vs Deepal S07 →
X1
X1
VS
UX
UX
X1 vs UX →
X1
X1
VS
GLA
GLA
X1 vs GLA →

NX vs X1 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.