BMW i4 vs BMW M3 Sedan

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BMW i4 in South Africa

BMW i4

M60 xDrive Gran Coupé Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,750,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 442 kW 🔧 795 Nm
VS
BMW M3 Sedan in South Africa

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,190,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 390 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BMW i4 vs BMW M3 Sedan: the short answer

i4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while M3 Sedan remains close.

i4 starts ZAR 690,000 cheaper i4 from ZAR 1,500,000 · M3 Sedan from ZAR 2,190,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification i4 M3 Sedan
Maximum Power i4442 kW M3 Sedan390 kW
Maximum Torque i4795 Nm M3 Sedan650 Nm @ 2750-5730 rpm
Engine Size i4Not Applicable M3 Sedan2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy i4Not Applicable M3 Sedan12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance i4140 mm M3 Sedan140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

i4

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

M3 Sedan

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

i4

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

M3 Sedan

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec i4 M3 Sedan
Model Introduced Year 2021 2020
Generation Battery-electric G26 Gran Coupé with four doors, a rear liftback and a road-car seating position. G80 four-door BMW M performance sedan, separate from the regular 3 Series range and from the Touring body.
Facelift History Current updated G26-based i4 Gran Coupé range in South Africa; current derivative identity is eDrive35 and M60 xDrive. Current G80-generation South African M3 Competition Sedan in all-wheel-drive form.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Sedan
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Premium Sedan Premium Sedan
Vehicle Type Car Car
Spec i4 M3 Sedan
Length 4783 mm 4801 mm
Width 1852 mm 1903 mm
Height 1448 mm 1438 mm
Wheelbase 2856 mm 2857 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 140 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 59 l
Boot/Cargo Space 470 l 480 l
Kerb Weight 2285 kg 1855 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2730 kg 2260 kg
Payload Capacity 520 kg 480 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 994 mm 985 mm
Rear Headroom 944 mm 952 mm
Front Legroom 1036 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 888 mm 895 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This i4 and M3 Sedan comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: i4 100 vs M3 Sedan 100.

Efficiency index: i4 90 vs M3 Sedan 47.

Safety-equipment index: i4 92 vs M3 Sedan 92.

Practicality index: i4 61 vs M3 Sedan 60.

Ownership-cover index: i4 not separately scored vs M3 Sedan not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

i4 leads by 9 points

i4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while M3 Sedan remains close.

Evidence leader 86 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 69% source coverage
86
#1 Evidence leader

i4

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 61
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 61
Leads by 9 points
77
#2

M3 Sedan

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 100
Efficiency 47
Safety 92
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Level Efficiency i4 +43 Safety Level Practicality i4 +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

i4

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 61/100

M3 Sedan

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW i4 leads the specification evidence index with 86 pts vs 77 pts for M3 Sedan

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, i4 leads. However, M3 Sedan may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

i4
i4
VS
i5
i5
i4 vs i5 →
i4
i4
VS
GR Supra
GR Supra
i4 vs GR Supra →
i4
i4
VS
7 Series
7 Series
i4 vs 7 Series →
i4
i4
VS
Mustang
Mustang
i4 vs Mustang →
i4
i4
VS
E-Class
E-Class
i4 vs E-Class →
i4
i4
VS
5 Series
5 Series
i4 vs 5 Series →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
i5
i5
M3 Sedan vs i5 →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
GR Supra
GR Supra
M3 Sedan vs GR Supra →

i4 vs M3 Sedan questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.