Toyota Fortuner vs BYD SHARK 6 DMO

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Fortuner in South Africa

Toyota Fortuner

2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
BYD SHARK 6 DMO in South Africa

BYD SHARK 6 DMO

Performance DMO AWD Plug-in Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 1,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 9.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Fortuner vs BYD SHARK 6 DMO: the short answer

SHARK 6 DMO has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Fortuner remains close.

Fortuner starts ZAR 304,000 cheaper Fortuner from ZAR 685,900 · SHARK 6 DMO from ZAR 989,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Fortuner SHARK 6 DMO
Maximum Power Fortuner150 kW SHARK 6 DMO180 kW
Maximum Torque Fortuner500 Nm SHARK 6 DMO380 Nm
Engine Size Fortuner2755 cc SHARK 6 DMONot Officially Disclosed
Combined Fuel Economy Fortuner13.2 km/l SHARK 6 DMO9.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Fortuner279 mm SHARK 6 DMO230 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota Fortuner

2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BYD SHARK 6 DMO

Performance DMO AWD

Hagalu editorial rating
4.4/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Fortuner

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

SHARK 6 DMO

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Fortuner

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

SHARK 6 DMO

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Fortuner SHARK 6 DMO
Model Introduced Year 2006 2025
Generation Currently sold Fortuner belongs to the second generation with periodic feature and safety upgrades First South African SHARK 6 DMO generation
Facelift History Major updates in 2016 (new generation) and feature refreshes in 2021 with improved infotainment, safety tech, and design tweaks No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Double-cab Pickup
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Dark Green, Grey -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT -
Model Year Current 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment SUV Double-cab Pickup
Tare Mass Kg GVM 2735 kg; Toyota SA does not publish tare mass -
Vehicle Type SUV Light commercial vehicle
Spec Fortuner SHARK 6 DMO
Length 4795 mm 5457 mm
Width 1855 mm 1971 mm
Height 1835 mm 1925 mm
Wheelbase 2745 mm 3260 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 279 mm 230 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 541 l 1200 l
Kerb Weight 1946 kg 2775 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2735 kg 3500 kg
Payload Capacity 493 kg 725 kg
Towing Capacity 2800 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 6.75 m
Front Headroom 1015 mm 1025 mm
Rear Headroom 979 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 1048 mm 1048 mm
Rear Legroom 928 mm 880.4 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Fortuner and SHARK 6 DMO comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Fortuner 79 vs SHARK 6 DMO 82.

Efficiency index: Fortuner 56 vs SHARK 6 DMO 53.

Safety-equipment index: Fortuner 89 vs SHARK 6 DMO 99.

Practicality index: Fortuner 84 vs SHARK 6 DMO 87.

Ownership-cover index: Fortuner 43 vs SHARK 6 DMO not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

SHARK 6 DMO leads by 9 points

SHARK 6 DMO has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Fortuner remains close.

Evidence leader 82 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 83% source coverage
82
#1 Evidence leader

SHARK 6 DMO

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 82
Efficiency 53
Safety 99
Practicality 87
Leads by 9 points
73
#2

Fortuner

72% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Ownership 43
Performance 79
Efficiency 56
Safety 89
Practicality 84
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance SHARK 6 DMO +3 Efficiency Fortuner +3 Safety SHARK 6 DMO +10 Practicality SHARK 6 DMO +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

SHARK 6 DMO

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 87/100

Fortuner

Performance 79/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 84/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BYD SHARK 6 DMO leads the specification evidence index with 82 pts vs 73 pts for Fortuner

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, SHARK 6 DMO leads. However, Fortuner may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Fortuner vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
Everest
Everest
Fortuner vs Everest →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
Ranger Wildtrak
Ranger Wildtrak
Fortuner vs Ranger Wildtrak →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
X1
X1
Fortuner vs X1 →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Fortuner vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
Hunter K50 REEV
Hunter K50 REEV
Fortuner vs Hunter K50 REEV →
SHARK 6 DMO
SHARK 6 DMO
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
SHARK 6 DMO vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
SHARK 6 DMO
SHARK 6 DMO
VS
Everest
Everest
SHARK 6 DMO vs Everest →

Fortuner vs SHARK 6 DMO questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.