Ford Everest vs KIA Sportage

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
KIA Sportage in South Africa

KIA Sportage

2WD 1.6T-GDI GT-Line S DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 823,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 265 Nm Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

⚡ Performance Everest
⛽ Fuel Economy Sportage
🛡 Safety Sportage
📦 Practicality Everest
🔑 Ownership Sportage
Sportage starts ZAR 825000 cheaper Everest from ZAR 825,000 · Sportage from ZAR 662,995

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Everest Sportage
Engine Power 184 kW 132 kW
Torque 600 Nm 265 Nm
Engine Size 2993 cc 1591 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 km/l 13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 226 mm 181 mm
Boot / Load Bay Three-row cargo area 466 l
Airbags 6 7
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 1570 kg
Seating Capacity 7 5
Warranty 4 years / 120 000 km 7 Years / 150,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Everest and Sportage are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Everest +34 pts
Efficiency Sportage +2 pts
Safety Sportage +55 pts
Practicality Everest +27 pts
Ownership Sportage +37 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Sportage

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Sportage

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Everest Sportage
Model Introduced Year 2015 2022
Generation Currently sold Everest belongs to the latest generation with enhanced comfort and safety systems Fifth generation (NQ5); global launch 2021, SA 2022
Facelift History Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design Fifth generation (NQ5) launched SA 2022; no facelift yet
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue Clear White, Aurora Black Pearl, Gravity Blue, Steel Grey, Intense Red, Glacial White Pearl, Interstellar Grey
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2WD 1.6T-GDI GT-Line S DCT
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Large SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Everest Sportage
Ground Clearance 226 mm 181 mm
Wheelbase 2900 mm 2680 mm
Length 4914 mm 4515 mm
Width 1923 mm 1865 mm
Height 1842 mm 1660 mm
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 1570 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight - 2080 kg
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space Three-row cargo area 466 l
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 1500 kg
Front Track Width - 1601 mm
Rear Track Width - 1608 mm
Turning Radius - 10.8 m
Load Bed Length Three-row cargo area 466 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - 1040 mm
Rear Legroom - 855 mm
Front Headroom - 1010 mm
Rear Headroom - 955 mm
Front Shoulder Room - 1405 mm
Rear Shoulder Room - 1350 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded - 1455 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume Three-row cargo area 466 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 7 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 54 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - 2080 kg
Ground Clearance Max 226 mm 181 mm
Ground Clearance Min 226 mm 181 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 226 mm 181 mm
Height Mm 1842 mm 1660 mm
Length Mm 4914 mm 4515 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Three-row cargo area 466 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume Three-row cargo area 466 l
Tare Mass Kg 2450 kg 1570 kg
Turning Circle - 10.8 m
Turning Circle M - 10.8 m
Width Mm 1923 mm 1865 mm
Front Overhang - 880 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded - 1455 l
Rear Overhang - 760 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Sportage leads by 4 points

Both Everest and Sportage are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 70 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 97% confidence
70
#1 Winner

Sportage

97% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Efficiency 54
Performance 57
Efficiency 54
Safety 100
Practicality 65
Ownership 71
Leads by 4 points
66
#2

Everest

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 92 Check Ownership 34
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 45
Practicality 92
Ownership 34
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +34 Efficiency Sportage +2 Safety Sportage +55 Practicality Everest +27 Ownership Sportage +37

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Sportage

Performance 57/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 71/100

Everest

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 92/100
Ownership 34/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 KIA Sportage wins with 70 pts vs 66 pts for Everest

In structured scoring, Sportage emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Everest may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Other Comparisons Worth Checking

See how similar cars go head-to-head — you might find a better fit than you expected.

Everest
Everest
VS
MU-X
MU-X
Everest vs MU-X →
Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Everest vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
Everest
Everest
VS
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
Everest vs C10 REEV →
Everest
Everest
VS
RAV4
RAV4
Everest vs RAV4 →
Everest
Everest
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
Everest vs Land Cruiser FJ →
Everest
Everest
VS
C9
C9
Everest vs C9 →
Sportage
Sportage
VS
MU-X
MU-X
Sportage vs MU-X →
Sportage
Sportage
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Sportage vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
Everest vs Tiggo 4 Cross →
Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Everest vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →
Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro
Everest vs Tiggo 4 Pro →
Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
Everest vs Tiggo 7 →
Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Everest vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
Everest
Everest
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
Everest vs Tiggo 7 Pro →

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Sportage edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Everest 52 vs Sportage 54. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Everest 45, Sportage 100. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Everest 34, Sportage 71. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Everest 92, Sportage 65. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Everest 91, Sportage 57. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Sportage edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Sportage scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Everest and Sportage in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 91 vs 57.

Efficiency: Everest scores 52 vs 54.

Safety: Everest scores 45 vs 100.

Practicality: Everest scores 92 vs 65.

Ownership: Everest scores 34 vs 71.

Final structured scoring gives Sportage the advantage in this comparison.