Ford Everest vs Hyundai Palisade

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Palisade
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
Hyundai Palisade in South Africa

Hyundai Palisade

2.2D Elite AWD 8AT 7-Seater Diesel Automatic Archive reference
ZAR 1,204,500 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 142 kW 🔧 440 Nm ⛽ 8.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Everest
Fuel Economy Everest
🛡 Safety Everest
📦 Practicality Everest
🔑 Ownership Palisade
Everest starts ZAR 1204500 cheaper Everest from ZAR 825,000 · Palisade from ZAR 1,204,500

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Everest Palisade
Engine Power 184 kW 142 kW
Torque 600 Nm 440 Nm
Engine Size 2993 cc 2199 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 km/l 8.2 km/l
Ground Clearance 226 mm Not confirmed
Boot / Load Bay Three-row cargo area Not confirmed
Airbags 6 Driver, passenger, side and curtain
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 1952 kg
Seating Capacity 7 7
Warranty 4 years / 120 000 km 5 years / 150 000 km plus 2 years / 50 000 km powertrain

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Everest has a slight advantage, but Palisade remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Everest +17 pts
Efficiency Everest +12 pts
Safety Everest +7 pts
Practicality Everest +15 pts
Ownership Palisade +17 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Palisade

Strengths
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Palisade

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Everest Palisade
Model Introduced Year 2015 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Currently sold Everest belongs to the latest generation with enhanced comfort and safety systems Current South African Palisade listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2022 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Discontinued - exact end year not confirmed
Body Style SUV Seven-seat SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue Not confirmed
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Not confirmed
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment Large SUV Not confirmed
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec Everest Palisade
Ground Clearance 226 mm Not confirmed
Wheelbase 2900 mm Not confirmed
Length 4914 mm Not confirmed
Width 1923 mm Not confirmed
Height 1842 mm Not confirmed
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 1952 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight - Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 7 7
Boot Space Three-row cargo area Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 2200 kg
Front Track Width - Not confirmed
Rear Track Width - Not confirmed
Turning Radius - Not confirmed
Load Bed Length Three-row cargo area Not confirmed
Load Bed Width - Not confirmed
Front Legroom - Not confirmed
Rear Legroom - Not confirmed
Front Headroom - Not confirmed
Rear Headroom - Not confirmed
Front Shoulder Room - Not confirmed
Rear Shoulder Room - Not confirmed
Boot Space Seats Folded - Not confirmed
Number of Doors 5 Not confirmed
Max Payload - Not confirmed
Boot Volume Three-row cargo area Not confirmed
Doors 5 Not confirmed
Seats 7 7
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 71 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Max 226 mm Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Min 226 mm Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Mm 226 mm Not confirmed
Height Mm 1842 mm Not confirmed
Length Mm 4914 mm Not confirmed
Loadbox Length Mm Three-row cargo area Not confirmed
Loadbox Width Mm - Not confirmed
Payload Kg - Not confirmed
Cargo Volume Three-row cargo area Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 2450 kg 1952 kg
Turning Circle - Not confirmed
Turning Circle M - Not confirmed
Width Mm 1923 mm Not confirmed

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Everest leads by 8 points

Everest has a slight advantage, but Palisade remains highly competitive.

Winner 66 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 77% confidence
66
#1 Winner

Everest

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 92 Check Ownership 34
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 45
Practicality 92
Ownership 34
Leads by 8 points
58
#2

Palisade

69% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 77 Check Safety 38
Performance 74
Efficiency 40
Safety 38
Practicality 77
Ownership 51
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +17 Efficiency Everest +12 Safety Everest +7 Practicality Everest +15 Ownership Palisade +17

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 92/100
Ownership 34/100

Palisade

Performance 74/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 38/100
Practicality 77/100
Ownership 51/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 66 pts vs 58 pts for Palisade

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Palisade may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Everest edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Everest 52 vs Palisade 40. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Everest 45, Palisade 38. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Everest 34, Palisade 51. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Everest 92, Palisade 77. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Everest 91, Palisade 74. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Everest edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Everest scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Everest and Palisade in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 91 vs 74.

Efficiency: Everest scores 52 vs 40.

Safety: Everest scores 45 vs 38.

Practicality: Everest scores 92 vs 77.

Ownership: Everest scores 34 vs 51.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.