Omoda C9 SHS vs Hyundai Palisade

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Palisade Discontinued model
Omoda C9 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C9 SHS

C9 SHS AWD Plug-in Hybrid 3-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⛽ 71.4 km/l
VS
Hyundai Palisade in South Africa

Hyundai Palisade

2.2D Elite AWD 8AT 7-Seater Diesel Discontinued model
ZAR 1,204,500 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 142 kW 🔧 440 Nm ⛽ 8.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C9 SHS vs Hyundai Palisade: the short answer

C9 SHS has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Palisade remains close.

Recorded price context C9 SHS: current from ZAR 999,900 · Palisade: last listed from ZAR 1,204,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C9 SHS Palisade
Maximum Power C9 SHSNot Officially Disclosed Palisade142 kW
Maximum Torque C9 SHSNot Officially Disclosed Palisade440 Nm
Engine Size C9 SHS1500 cc Palisade2199 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C9 SHS71.4 km/l Palisade8.2 km/l
Ground Clearance C9 SHS165 mm Palisade203 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Palisade 2.2D Elite AWD 8AT 7-Seater

Source type: South Africa

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C9 SHS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Palisade

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C9 SHS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Palisade

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C9 SHS Palisade
Model Introduced Year 2025 Not confirmed
Generation Current South Africa C9 SHS range Not confirmed
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Not confirmed
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Seven-seat SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg Not Available 1952 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec C9 SHS Palisade
Length 4775 mm Not confirmed
Width 1920 mm Not confirmed
Height 1671 mm Not confirmed
Wheelbase 2800 mm Not confirmed
Ground Clearance (Default) 165 mm 203 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 140 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 l 71 l
Boot/Cargo Space 660 l Not confirmed
Kerb Weight 2195 kg 1952 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2717 kg Not confirmed
Payload Capacity 522 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 2200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m Not confirmed
Front Headroom 1005 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 970 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1070 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 960 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This C9 SHS and Palisade comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C9 SHS 92 vs Palisade 74.

Efficiency index: C9 SHS 96 vs Palisade 40.

Safety-equipment index: C9 SHS 94 vs Palisade 90.

Practicality index: C9 SHS 69 vs Palisade 79.

Ownership-cover index: C9 SHS not separately scored vs Palisade not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C9 SHS leads by 14 points

C9 SHS has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Palisade remains close.

Evidence leader 87 /100
Lead 14 points
Data 55% source coverage
87
#1 Evidence leader

C9 SHS

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 96 Check Practicality 69
Performance 92
Efficiency 96
Safety 94
Practicality 69
Leads by 14 points
73
#2

Palisade

51% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 74
Efficiency 40
Safety 90
Practicality 79
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C9 SHS +18 Efficiency C9 SHS +56 Safety C9 SHS +4 Practicality Palisade +10

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C9 SHS

Performance 92/100
Efficiency 96/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 69/100

Palisade

Performance 74/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 79/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Omoda C9 SHS leads the specification evidence index with 87 pts vs 73 pts for Palisade

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C9 SHS leads. However, Palisade may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

C9 SHS vs Palisade questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.