Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Everest
Fuel Economy Everest
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser 76
🔑 Ownership Land Cruiser 76
Everest starts ZAR 980000 cheaper Everest from ZAR 825,000 · Land Cruiser 76 from ZAR 980,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Everest Land Cruiser 76
Engine Power 184 kW 202 kW
Torque 600 Nm 381 Nm
Engine Size 2993 cc 3956 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 km/l 13 km/l
Ground Clearance 226 mm 230 mm
Boot / Load Bay Three-row cargo area 909 l
Airbags 6 2
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 2100 kg
Seating Capacity 7 8
Warranty 4 years / 120 000 km 3 years / 100 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Everest and Land Cruiser 76 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Everest +14 pts
Efficiency Everest +3 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +4 pts
Ownership Land Cruiser 76 +10 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Land Cruiser 76

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Everest Land Cruiser 76
Model Introduced Year 2015 1984
Generation Currently sold Everest belongs to the latest generation with enhanced comfort and safety systems 70 Series – one of the world's longest-running vehicle nameplates
Facelift History Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design Continuous mechanical updates while retaining core body-on-frame design. Minor updates in 2007, 2014, 2021
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue White, Beige
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Large SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Everest Land Cruiser 76
Ground Clearance 226 mm 230 mm
Wheelbase 2900 mm 2730 mm
Length 4914 mm 4890 mm
Width 1923 mm 1885 mm
Height 1842 mm 1970 mm
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 2100 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight - 3300 kg
Seating Capacity 7 8
Boot Space Three-row cargo area 909 l
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Turning Radius - 6.0 m
Load Bed Length Three-row cargo area 909 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - 909 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume Three-row cargo area 909 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 7 8
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 87 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - 3300 kg
Ground Clearance Max 226 mm 230 mm
Ground Clearance Min 226 mm 230 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 226 mm 230 mm
Height Mm 1842 mm 1970 mm
Length Mm 4914 mm 4890 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Three-row cargo area 909 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume Three-row cargo area 909 l
Tare Mass Kg 2450 kg 2100 kg
Turning Circle - 6.0 m
Turning Circle M - 6.0 m
Width Mm 1923 mm 1885 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Everest leads by 2 points

Both Everest and Land Cruiser 76 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 66 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 77% confidence
66
#1 Winner

Everest

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 92 Check Ownership 34
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 45
Practicality 92
Ownership 34
Leads by 2 points
64
#2

Land Cruiser 76

95% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 96 Check Ownership 44
Performance 77
Efficiency 49
Safety 45
Practicality 96
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +14 Efficiency Everest +3 Safety Level Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +4 Ownership Land Cruiser 76 +10

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 92/100
Ownership 34/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 96/100
Ownership 44/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 66 pts vs 64 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 76 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Everest edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Everest 52 vs Land Cruiser 76 49. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Everest 45, Land Cruiser 76 45. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Everest 34, Land Cruiser 76 44. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Everest 92, Land Cruiser 76 96. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Everest 91, Land Cruiser 76 77. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Everest edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Everest scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Everest and Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 91 vs 77.

Efficiency: Everest scores 52 vs 49.

Safety: Everest scores 45 vs 45.

Practicality: Everest scores 92 vs 96.

Ownership: Everest scores 34 vs 44.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.