Hyundai Elantra vs BMW M3 Sedan

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Elantra Discontinued model
Hyundai Elantra in South Africa

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol Discontinued model
ZAR 492,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 143 Nm ⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
BMW M3 Sedan in South Africa

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,190,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 390 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Elantra vs BMW M3 Sedan: the short answer

M3 Sedan holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Elantra.

Recorded price context Elantra: last listed from ZAR 448,900 · M3 Sedan: current from ZAR 2,190,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Elantra M3 Sedan
Maximum Power Elantra85 kW @ 6300 rpm M3 Sedan390 kW
Maximum Torque Elantra143 Nm @ 4500 rpm M3 Sedan650 Nm @ 2750-5730 rpm
Engine Size Elantra1497 cc M3 Sedan2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Elantra17.5 km/l M3 Sedan12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Elantra130 mm M3 Sedan140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Hyundai Elantra

1.5 IVT Fluid

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Elantra

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

M3 Sedan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Elantra

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

M3 Sedan

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Elantra M3 Sedan
Model Introduced Year 1990 2020
Generation Seventh generation Elantra on Hyundai's K3 platform; bold parametric design language marks a clear break from the conservative sixth gen G80 four-door BMW M performance sedan, separate from the regular 3 Series range and from the Touring body.
Facelift History Seventh generation launched globally in 2020 and brought to SA; significant leap in styling and interior quality over the previous generation Current G80-generation South African M3 Competition Sedan in all-wheel-drive form.
Facelift Launched Since 2020 Original current-generation version
Body Style Sedan Sedan
Production Status discontinued active
Segment Sedan Premium Sedan
Tare Mass Kg 1355 kg -
Vehicle Type Sedan Car
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Spec Elantra M3 Sedan
Length 4680 mm 4801 mm
Width 1825 mm 1903 mm
Height 1415 mm 1438 mm
Wheelbase 2720 mm 2857 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 130 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 l 59 l
Boot/Cargo Space 473 l 480 l
Kerb Weight 1355 kg 1855 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1860 kg 2260 kg
Payload Capacity 505 kg 480 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.6 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 985 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 952 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 895 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Elantra and M3 Sedan comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Elantra 36 vs M3 Sedan 100.

Efficiency index: Elantra 67 vs M3 Sedan 47.

Safety-equipment index: Elantra 84 vs M3 Sedan 92.

Practicality index: Elantra 61 vs M3 Sedan 60.

Ownership-cover index: Elantra 65 vs M3 Sedan not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

M3 Sedan leads by 15 points

M3 Sedan holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Elantra.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 83% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

M3 Sedan

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 100
Efficiency 47
Safety 92
Practicality 60
Leads by 15 points
62
#2

Elantra

93% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 67
Safety 84
Practicality 61
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance M3 Sedan +64 Efficiency Elantra +20 Safety M3 Sedan +8 Practicality Elantra +1

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

M3 Sedan

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 60/100

Elantra

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW M3 Sedan leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 62 pts for Elantra

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, M3 Sedan leads. However, Elantra may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
E-Class
E-Class
Elantra vs E-Class →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Elantra vs Mustang →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
5 Series
5 Series
Elantra vs 5 Series →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
CLA Electric
CLA ElectricUpcoming
Elantra vs CLA Electric →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
i4
i4
Elantra vs i4 →
Elantra
ElantraDiscontinued
VS
GR Supra
GR Supra
Elantra vs GR Supra →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
E-Class
E-Class
M3 Sedan vs E-Class →
M3 Sedan
M3 Sedan
VS
Mustang
Mustang
M3 Sedan vs Mustang →

Elantra vs M3 Sedan questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.