Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Rolls-Royce Dawn

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Rolls-Royce Dawn Discontinued model
Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,211,910 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 450 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Dawn in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Dawn

Dawn Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
No longer sold new historical price not confirmed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 820 Nm ⛽ 6.99 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Rolls-Royce Dawn: the short answer

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Dawn remains close.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 Dawn
Maximum Power D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35140 kW @ 3600 rpm Dawn420 kW @ 5250-6000 rpm
Maximum Torque D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35450 Nm Dawn820 Nm @ 1600-4750 rpm
Engine Size D-Max Arctic Trucks AT352999 cc Dawn6592 cc
Combined Fuel Economy D-Max Arctic Trucks AT3511.8 km/l Dawn6.99 km/l
Ground Clearance D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35266 mm Dawn149 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Rolls-Royce Dawn

Dawn

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Dawn

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Dawn

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 Dawn
Model Introduced Year 2023 2016
Generation Seventh-generation D-Max; MY26 facelift; AT35 conversion Dawn four-seat convertible; this archive profile uses the MY17 World specification corroborated by a February 2018 South African road test.
Facelift History MY26 mid-cycle facelift announced 3 June 2026 The MY17 configuration is kept separate from the 2015 launch specification, which published different length, torque, acceleration, consumption and CO2 figures.
Facelift Launched Since June 2026 2017
Facelift Version Ending Current 2023
Body Style Double-cab pickup Convertible
Gross Combined Mass Kg 5780 kg Not confirmed
Model Year MY26 2017
Production Status active discontinued
Segment Extreme-terrain lifestyle pickup Ultra-luxury convertible
Tare Mass Kg 2160 kg Not confirmed
Vehicle Type Light commercial vehicle Passenger car
Model Code M260RY7 Not confirmed
Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 Dawn
Length 5333 mm 5295 mm
Width 2040 mm 1947 mm
Height 1875 mm 1502 mm
Wheelbase 3125 mm 3112 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 266 mm 149 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 220 mm 149 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 l 82 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l 321 l
Kerb Weight 2200 kg 2560 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2880 kg 3040 kg
Payload Capacity 660 kg 480 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.25 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom 1005 mm 1018 mm
Rear Headroom 900 mm 963 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1054 mm
Rear Legroom 700 mm 937 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and Dawn comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 75 vs Dawn 97.

Efficiency index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 47 vs Dawn 31.

Safety-equipment index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 94 vs Dawn 90.

Practicality index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 88 vs Dawn 52.

Ownership-cover index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 not separately scored vs Dawn not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads by 8 points

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Dawn remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 74% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

74% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 94
Practicality 88
Leads by 8 points
70
#2

Dawn

76% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 97 Check Efficiency 31
Performance 97
Efficiency 31
Safety 90
Practicality 52
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Dawn +22 Efficiency D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +16 Safety D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +4 Practicality D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +36

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 88/100

Dawn

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 31/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 52/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 70 pts for Dawn

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads. However, Dawn may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Dawn questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.