MG Cyberster vs BMW i4

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

MG Cyberster in South Africa

MG Cyberster

Dual Motor 4WD Roadster Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,399,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 375 kW 🔧 725 Nm
VS
BMW i4 in South Africa

BMW i4

M60 xDrive Gran Coupé Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,750,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 442 kW 🔧 795 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

MG Cyberster vs BMW i4: the short answer

i4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Cyberster remains close.

Cyberster starts ZAR 100,100 cheaper Cyberster from ZAR 1,399,900 · i4 from ZAR 1,500,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Cyberster i4
Maximum Power Cyberster375 kW i4442 kW
Maximum Torque Cyberster725 Nm i4795 Nm
Engine Size CybersterNot Applicable i4Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy CybersterNot Applicable i4Not Applicable
Ground Clearance Cyberster116 mm i4140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

MG Cyberster

Dual Motor 4WD Roadster

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BMW i4

M60 xDrive Gran Coupé

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Cyberster

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

i4

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Cyberster

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

i4

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Cyberster i4
Model Introduced Year 2025 2021
Generation First-generation battery-electric Cyberster roadster in local dual-motor all-wheel-drive form. Battery-electric G26 Gran Coupé with four doors, a rear liftback and a road-car seating position.
Facelift History South African launch specification introduced as MG's electric halo in 2025. Current updated G26-based i4 Gran Coupé range in South Africa; current derivative identity is eDrive35 and M60 xDrive.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Two-door, two-seat soft-top roadster Sedan
Model Year 2025 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Electric Sports Roadster Premium Sedan
Vehicle Type Convertible Car
Spec Cyberster i4
Length 4535 mm 4783 mm
Width 1913 mm 1852 mm
Height 1329 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 2856 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 116 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 249 l 470 l
Kerb Weight 1985 kg 2285 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2210 kg 2730 kg
Payload Capacity 225 kg 520 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.45 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1043 mm 994 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 944 mm
Front Legroom 1070 mm 1036 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 888 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Cyberster and i4 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Cyberster 100 vs i4 100.

Efficiency index: Cyberster 90 vs i4 90.

Safety-equipment index: Cyberster 77 vs i4 92.

Practicality index: Cyberster 34 vs i4 61.

Ownership-cover index: Cyberster not separately scored vs i4 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

i4 leads by 11 points

i4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Cyberster remains close.

Evidence leader 86 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 69% source coverage
86
#1 Evidence leader

i4

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 61
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 61
Leads by 11 points
75
#2

Cyberster

63% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 34
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 77
Practicality 34
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Level Efficiency Level Safety i4 +15 Practicality i4 +27

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

i4

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 61/100

Cyberster

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 77/100
Practicality 34/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW i4 leads the specification evidence index with 86 pts vs 75 pts for Cyberster

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, i4 leads. However, Cyberster may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Cyberster
Cyberster
VS
CLE Cabriolet
CLE Cabriolet
Cyberster vs CLE Cabriolet →
Cyberster
Cyberster
VS
GR Supra
GR Supra
Cyberster vs GR Supra →
Cyberster
Cyberster
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Cyberster vs Mustang →
Cyberster
Cyberster
VS
E-Class
E-Class
Cyberster vs E-Class →
Cyberster
Cyberster
VS
5 Series
5 Series
Cyberster vs 5 Series →
Cyberster
Cyberster
VS
CLA Electric
CLA ElectricUpcoming
Cyberster vs CLA Electric →
i4
i4
VS
CLE Cabriolet
CLE Cabriolet
i4 vs CLE Cabriolet →
i4
i4
VS
GR Supra
GR Supra
i4 vs GR Supra →

Cyberster vs i4 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.