Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-60

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-60: the short answer

CX-5 and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

CX-5 starts ZAR 219,700 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · CX-60 from ZAR 790,200

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 CX-60
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc CX-602488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l CX-6013.0 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm CX-60178.8 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 CX-60
Model Introduced Year 2017 2023
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update.
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment Mid-size family SUV Premium mid-size SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1470 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-5 CX-60
Length 4575 mm 4745 mm
Width 1845 mm 1890 mm
Height 1680 mm 1687.5 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2870 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 178.8 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 58 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 477 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1470 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 2342 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 872 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.85 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 990 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and CX-60 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs CX-60 59.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs CX-60 51.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs CX-60 98.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs CX-60 68.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs CX-60 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-60 leads by 7 points

CX-5 and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 7 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +11 Efficiency CX-5 +5 Safety CX-60 +10 Practicality CX-60 +7

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-60 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-60 leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
Fortuner
Fortuner
CX-5 vs Fortuner →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
X-Trail
X-Trail
CX-5 vs X-Trail →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiggo 9
Tiggo 9
CX-5 vs Tiggo 9 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
J7 SHS
J7 SHS
CX-5 vs J7 SHS →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
T1 i-DM
T1 i-DM
CX-5 vs T1 i-DM →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
CR-V
CR-V
CX-5 vs CR-V →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Fortuner
Fortuner
CX-60 vs Fortuner →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
X-Trail
X-Trail
CX-60 vs X-Trail →

CX-5 vs CX-60 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.