Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-5: the short answer

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-5 remains close.

CX-5 starts ZAR 119,400 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · CX-5 from ZAR 570,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V CX-5
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc CX-51998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l CX-514.5 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm CX-5200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

CX-5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

CX-5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V CX-5
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2700 mm
Length 4690 mm 4575 mm
Width 1860 mm 1845 mm
Height 1690 mm 1680 mm
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1575 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 2065 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 438 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1000 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 56 l
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm -
Payload Capacity 500 kg 490 kg
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.95 m
Front Headroom 970 mm -
Rear Headroom 970 mm -
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1041 mm
Rear Legroom 1041 mm 1007 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 200 mm
Spec CR-V CX-5
Gearbox eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Auto
Drivetrain Layout All Wheel Drive Front-engine, front-wheel drive
LSD Available Electronic AWD Control -
Transfer Case Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Type eCVT Automatic Automatic
Gear Shift Type eCVT Automatic Automatic
Drivetrain AWD FWD
Axle Layout AWD 4x2
Differential Lock Electronic AWD Lock Not Applicable
4WD Engagement Available Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Available Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears Not Applicable 6
Transmission Speeds Not Applicable 6
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Not Applicable Standard
Automatic Shift Paddles Not Applicable Standard
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable 4.624
Clutch Type Not Applicable -
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and CX-5 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs CX-5 48.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs CX-5 56.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs CX-5 88.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs CX-5 61.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs CX-5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CR-V leads by 13 points

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-5 remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 94% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Leads by 13 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CR-V +29 Efficiency CR-V +24 Safety CR-V +3 Practicality CR-V +5

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda CR-V leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CR-V leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
03T
03T
CR-V vs 03T →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
CR-V vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
CR-V vs T-Roc →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
H7
H7
CR-V vs H7 →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
CR-V vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
CR-V vs E5 EM-i →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
03T
03T
CX-5 vs 03T →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
CX-5 vs SEALION 6 DM-i →

CR-V vs CX-5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.