Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota Fortuner

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Fortuner in South Africa

Toyota Fortuner

2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT Diesel Current
ZAR 999,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota Fortuner: the short answer

CX-60 and Fortuner are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Fortuner starts ZAR 104,300 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · Fortuner from ZAR 685,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 Fortuner
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm Fortuner150 kW
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm Fortuner500 Nm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc Fortuner2755 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l Fortuner13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm Fortuner279 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-60

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Fortuner

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Fortuner

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 Fortuner
Model Introduced Year 2023 2006
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Currently sold Fortuner belongs to the second generation with periodic feature and safety upgrades
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Major updates in 2016 (new generation) and feature refreshes in 2021 with improved infotainment, safety tech, and design tweaks
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active published
Segment Premium mid-size SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg GVM 2735 kg; Toyota SA does not publish tare mass
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Dark Green, Grey
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.8 GD-6 4X4 GR-Sport 6AT
Spec CX-60 Fortuner
Length 4745 mm 4795 mm
Width 1890 mm 1855 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1835 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2745 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 279 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l -
Kerb Weight 1470 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg 2735 kg
Payload Capacity 872 kg -
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 2800 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 990 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and Fortuner comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs Fortuner 80.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs Fortuner 56.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs Fortuner 89.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs Fortuner 89.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs Fortuner 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Fortuner leads by 4 points

CX-60 and Fortuner are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 74 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 59% source coverage
74
#1 Evidence leader

Fortuner

59% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Ownership 43
Performance 80
Efficiency 56
Safety 89
Practicality 89
Ownership 43
Leads by 4 points
70
#2

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Fortuner +21 Efficiency Fortuner +5 Safety CX-60 +9 Practicality Fortuner +21

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Fortuner

Performance 80/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 89/100
Ownership 43/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Fortuner leads the specification evidence index with 74 pts vs 70 pts for CX-60

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Fortuner leads. However, CX-60 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
CX-60 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
MU-X
MU-X
CX-60 vs MU-X →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
CX-60 vs C10 REEV →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Outlander
Outlander
CX-60 vs Outlander →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
CX-60 vs Land Cruiser FJ →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
RAV4
RAV4
CX-60 vs RAV4 →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Fortuner vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
Fortuner
Fortuner
VS
MU-X
MU-X
Fortuner vs MU-X →

CX-60 vs Fortuner questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.