Mazda CX-3 vs Honda Elevate

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
VS
Honda Elevate in South Africa

Honda Elevate

1.5 Elegance CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 399,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 119 kW 🔧 145 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-3 vs Honda Elevate: the short answer

CX-3 and Elevate are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Elevate starts ZAR 70,100 cheaper CX-3 from ZAR 440,000 · Elevate from ZAR 369,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-3 Elevate
Maximum Power CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm Elevate119 kW
Maximum Torque CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm Elevate145 Nm
Engine Size CX-31998 cc Elevate1498 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-315.9 km/l Elevate16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-3155 mm Elevate220 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-3

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Elevate

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-3

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Elevate

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-3 Elevate
Model Introduced Year 2015 2023
Generation Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3 Built on Honda’s latest compact SUV platform with improved safety and structural strength
Facelift History The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range. Recently introduced model with latest design language and modern features
Facelift Launched Since 2015 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Compact crossover SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1270 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - White, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red, Black
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec CX-3 Elevate
Length 4275 mm 4312 mm
Width 1765 mm 1790 mm
Height 1542 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 2650 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 40 l
Boot/Cargo Space 230 l 458 l
Kerb Weight 1270 kg 1240 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1735 kg 1680 kg
Payload Capacity 465 kg 400 kg
Towing Capacity 850 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.2 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 888 mm 995 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 220 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1015 mm
Rear Headroom - 980 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-3 and Elevate comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-3 47 vs Elevate 39.

Efficiency index: CX-3 61 vs Elevate 62.

Safety-equipment index: CX-3 84 vs Elevate 88.

Practicality index: CX-3 48 vs Elevate 63.

Ownership-cover index: CX-3 not separately scored vs Elevate 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-3 leads by 0 points

CX-3 and Elevate are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 71% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Leads by 0 points
60
#2

Elevate

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 62
Safety 88
Practicality 63
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-3 +8 Efficiency Elevate +1 Safety Elevate +4 Practicality Elevate +15

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

Elevate

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 63/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-3 leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 60 pts for Elevate

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-3 leads. However, Elevate may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-3
CX-3
VS
Jolion
Jolion
CX-3 vs Jolion →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
CX-3 vs T-Cross →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
CX-3 vs ZS Pro →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
CX-3 vs Jolion Pro →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Seltos
Seltos
CX-3 vs Seltos →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
CX-3 vs UNI-S →
Elevate
Elevate
VS
Jolion
Jolion
Elevate vs Jolion →
Elevate
Elevate
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
Elevate vs T-Cross →

CX-3 vs Elevate questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.