Mazda CX-3 vs Volkswagen T-Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
VS
Volkswagen T-Cross in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Cross

1.0 TSI 85kW R-Line DSG Petrol Current
ZAR 548,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 175 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-3 vs Volkswagen T-Cross: the short answer

CX-3 and T-Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

T-Cross starts ZAR 40,100 cheaper CX-3 from ZAR 440,000 · T-Cross from ZAR 399,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-3 T-Cross
Maximum Power CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm T-Cross85 kW
Maximum Torque CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm T-Cross175 Nm
Engine Size CX-31998 cc T-Cross1000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-315.9 km/l T-Cross18.2 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-3155 mm T-Cross188 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-3

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

T-Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-3

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

T-Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-3 T-Cross
Model Introduced Year 2015 2020
Generation Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3 First generation T-Cross on MQB-A0 platform
Facelift History The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range. Facelift in 2024 with updated features
Facelift Launched Since 2015 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active published
Segment Compact crossover SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1270 kg 1291 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - 4x2 configuration for the local line-up
Spec CX-3 T-Cross
Length 4275 mm 4135 mm
Width 1765 mm 1760 mm
Height 1542 mm 1573 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 2551 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 188 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 40 l
Boot/Cargo Space 230 l 385 l
Kerb Weight 1270 kg 1291 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1735 kg 1750 kg
Payload Capacity 465 kg -
Towing Capacity 850 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 10.6 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 888 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-3 and T-Cross comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-3 47 vs T-Cross 34.

Efficiency index: CX-3 61 vs T-Cross 69.

Safety-equipment index: CX-3 84 vs T-Cross 81.

Practicality index: CX-3 48 vs T-Cross 60.

Ownership-cover index: CX-3 not separately scored vs T-Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-3 leads by 0 points

CX-3 and T-Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 71% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Leads by 0 points
60
#2

T-Cross

63% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 81 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 69
Safety 81
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-3 +13 Efficiency T-Cross +8 Safety CX-3 +3 Practicality T-Cross +12

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

T-Cross

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 81/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-3 leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 60 pts for T-Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-3 leads. However, T-Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-3
CX-3
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
CX-3 vs Corolla Cross →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
CX-3 vs Tiggo 7 →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
CX-3 vs CS75 Pro →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Jolion
Jolion
CX-3 vs Jolion →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Jolion Pro Limited
Jolion Pro Limited
CX-3 vs Jolion Pro Limited →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
CX-3 vs Jimny 5-Door →
T-Cross
T-Cross
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
T-Cross vs Corolla Cross →
T-Cross
T-Cross
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
T-Cross vs Tiggo 7 →

CX-3 vs T-Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.