Changan CS75 Pro vs KIA K2700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Changan CS75 Pro in South Africa

Changan CS75 Pro

1.5T AT 5S CE Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 474,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 13.33 km/l
VS
KIA K2700 in South Africa

KIA K2700

2.7D Workhorse Tipper Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 404,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 56 kW 🔧 152 Nm ⛽ 10.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan CS75 Pro vs KIA K2700: the short answer

CS75 Pro has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over K2700.

K2700 starts ZAR 77,905 cheaper CS75 Pro from ZAR 429,900 · K2700 from ZAR 351,995

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CS75 Pro K2700
Maximum Power CS75 Pro138 kW K270056 kW @ 3200 rpm
Maximum Torque CS75 Pro300 Nm K2700152 Nm @ 2000 rpm
Engine Size CS75 Pro1494 cc K27002665 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CS75 Pro13.33 km/l K270010.5 km/l
Ground Clearance CS75 ProNot Officially Disclosed K2700195 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CS75 Pro

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

K2700

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

CS75 Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

K2700

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CS75 Pro K2700
Model Introduced Year 2025 1997
Generation Current South African CS75 Pro generation with two equipment grades and two seating configurations. Long-running light commercial vehicle; established in SA commercial fleet market
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the present CS75 Pro range entered local sale. Updated in 2005, 2012; current model ongoing production with specification updates
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2012
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style SUV Van
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV Van
Vehicle Type Passenger car Van
Color Note - White (standard fleet specification)
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg - 1880 kg
Spec CS75 Pro K2700
Length 4730 mm 4870 mm
Width 1870 mm 1840 mm
Height 1720 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase 2786 mm 2685 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 195 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 145 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 620 l 3000 l
Kerb Weight 1550 kg 1880 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1925 kg 2850 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1300 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1180 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 1 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 11.4 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1010 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1040 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This CS75 Pro and K2700 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CS75 Pro 59 vs K2700 32.

Efficiency index: CS75 Pro 52 vs K2700 43.

Safety-equipment index: CS75 Pro 76 vs K2700 0.

Practicality index: CS75 Pro 79 vs K2700 68.

Ownership-cover index: CS75 Pro not separately scored vs K2700 49.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CS75 Pro leads by 30 points

CS75 Pro has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over K2700.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 30 points
Data 65% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

CS75 Pro

65% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 79 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 59
Efficiency 52
Safety 76
Practicality 79
Leads by 30 points
37
#2

K2700

84% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Practicality 68 Check Safety 0
Performance 32
Efficiency 43
Safety 0
Practicality 68
Ownership 49
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CS75 Pro +27 Efficiency CS75 Pro +9 Safety CS75 Pro +76 Practicality CS75 Pro +11

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CS75 Pro

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 79/100

K2700

Performance 32/100
Efficiency 43/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 68/100
Ownership 49/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Changan CS75 Pro leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 37 pts for K2700

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CS75 Pro leads. However, K2700 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CS75 Pro vs K2700 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.