GWM Cannon vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM Cannon Discontinued model
GWM Cannon in South Africa

GWM Cannon

2.0T Double Cab LX 4x4 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 634,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 480 Nm ⛽ 9.8 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM Cannon vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab: the short answer

Triton Double Cab has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Cannon remains close.

Recorded price context Cannon: last listed from ZAR 484,900 · Triton Double Cab: current from ZAR 639,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Cannon Triton Double Cab
Maximum Power Cannon110 kW Triton Double Cab150 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Cannon480 Nm Triton Double Cab470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm
Engine Size Cannon1996 cc Triton Double Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Cannon9.8 km/l Triton Double Cab11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Cannon210 mm Triton Double Cab228 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for GWM Cannon 2.0T Double Cab LX 4x4

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Cannon

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Cannon

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Cannon Triton Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2021 2024
Generation Cannon sold in South Africa is the first generation, derived from Great Wall's POER platform shared with the P Series but with bodywork, suspension calibration and cabin treatment positioned for the lifestyle segment rather than the work bakkie use case. Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History Cannon received a mid-cycle update in 2023 that brought the 12.3-inch infotainment system to LS as standard, added wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto across the range, and revised front-bumper geometry to improve approach angle by 2 degrees. A 2025 specification update standardised the panoramic sunroof on the LX trim and added the 360-camera to LS spec. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024; Bi-Turbo added in 2026.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Current specification
Body Type Cab Double Cab -
Tare Mass Kg 2035 kg -
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Double-cab pickup
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed One-ton double-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Light commercial vehicle
Spec Cannon Triton Double Cab
Length 5380 mm 5360 mm
Width 1920 mm 1930 mm
Height 1835 mm 1815 mm
Wheelbase 3180 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 228 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 75 l
Kerb Weight 2035 kg 2035 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3000 kg 3020 kg
Payload Capacity 900 kg 985 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 13.6 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 975 mm 972 mm
Front Legroom 1070 mm 1059 mm
Rear Legroom 880 mm 857 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 195 mm
Boot/Cargo Space Not confirmed 1262 l
Number of Rows Not confirmed 2 rows

In depth: how these cars differ

This Cannon and Triton Double Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Cannon 61 vs Triton Double Cab 75.

Efficiency index: Cannon 41 vs Triton Double Cab 47.

Safety-equipment index: Cannon 93 vs Triton Double Cab 95.

Practicality index: Cannon 81 vs Triton Double Cab 90.

Ownership-cover index: Cannon 65 vs Triton Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Triton Double Cab leads by 8 points

Triton Double Cab has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Cannon remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 83% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Leads by 8 points
70
#2

Cannon

94% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 41
Performance 61
Efficiency 41
Safety 93
Practicality 81
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Triton Double Cab +14 Efficiency Triton Double Cab +6 Safety Triton Double Cab +2 Practicality Triton Double Cab +9

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

Cannon

Performance 61/100
Efficiency 41/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 81/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 70 pts for Cannon

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Triton Double Cab leads. However, Cannon may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

Cannon
CannonDiscontinued
VS
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
Cannon vs D-Max Double Cab →
Cannon
CannonDiscontinued
VS
Hilux Xtra Cab
Hilux Xtra Cab
Cannon vs Hilux Xtra Cab →
Cannon
CannonDiscontinued
VS
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
Cannon vs T9 Double Cab →
Cannon
CannonDiscontinued
VS
Hilux Double Cab
Hilux Double Cab
Cannon vs Hilux Double Cab →
Cannon
CannonDiscontinued
VS
D-Max Extended Cab
D-Max Extended Cab
Cannon vs D-Max Extended Cab →
Cannon
CannonDiscontinued
VS
Amarok
Amarok
Cannon vs Amarok →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
Triton Double Cab vs D-Max Double Cab →
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
VS
Hilux Xtra Cab
Hilux Xtra Cab
Triton Double Cab vs Hilux Xtra Cab →

Cannon vs Triton Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.