Suzuki Baleno vs MG HS

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Baleno in South Africa

Suzuki Baleno

1.5 GLX AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 341,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Baleno vs MG HS: the short answer

HS has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Baleno remains close.

Baleno starts ZAR 230,000 cheaper Baleno from ZAR 269,900 · HS from ZAR 499,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Baleno HS
Maximum Power Baleno77 kW HS170 kW
Maximum Torque Baleno138 Nm HS370 Nm
Engine Size Baleno1462 cc HS1986 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Baleno16.1 km/l HS11.63 km/l
Ground Clearance Baleno0 mm HS145 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Suzuki Baleno

1.5 GLX AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Baleno

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Baleno

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Baleno HS
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation Current market generation Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains.
Facelift History Current market specification Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Five-door mid-size SUV
Model Year 2026 2025
Production Status active active
Segment Hatchback Mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type Hatchback SUV
Spec Baleno HS
Length 3990 mm 4655 mm
Width 1745 mm 1890 mm
Height 1500 mm 1655 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 2765 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 145 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 318 l 507 l
Kerb Weight 940 kg 1590 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1700 kg 2065 kg
Payload Capacity 760 kg 475 kg
Towing Capacity 500 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.65 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 968 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm 964 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1044 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 980 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Baleno and HS comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Baleno 34 vs HS 70.

Efficiency index: Baleno 62 vs HS 46.

Safety-equipment index: Baleno 87 vs HS 98.

Practicality index: Baleno 50 vs HS 57.

Ownership-cover index: Baleno not separately scored vs HS not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

HS leads by 12 points

HS has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Baleno remains close.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 12 points
Data 78% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Leads by 12 points
57
#2

Baleno

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +36 Efficiency Baleno +16 Safety HS +11 Practicality HS +7

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

Baleno

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 50/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG HS leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 57 pts for Baleno

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, HS leads. However, Baleno may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Baleno
Baleno
VS
Fit
Fit
Baleno vs Fit →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
Baleno vs Tiggo 7 Pro →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
Baleno vs UNI-S →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
Seltos
Seltos
Baleno vs Seltos →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
Baleno vs Jolion Pro →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
C5-X
C5-X
Baleno vs C5-X →
HS
HS
VS
Fit
Fit
HS vs Fit →
HS
HS
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
HS vs Tiggo 7 Pro →

Baleno vs HS questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.