BAIC B30 vs MG HS

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BAIC B30 in South Africa

BAIC B30

B30 Elite Adventure Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 519,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 305 Nm ⛽ 12.41 km/l
VS
MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BAIC B30 vs MG HS: the short answer

B30 and HS are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

HS starts ZAR 20,000 cheaper B30 from ZAR 519,900 · HS from ZAR 499,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification B30 HS
Maximum Power B30138 kW HS170 kW
Maximum Torque B30305 Nm HS370 Nm
Engine Size B301498 cc HS1986 cc
Combined Fuel Economy B3012.41 km/l HS11.63 km/l
Ground Clearance B30215 mm HS145 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

B30

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

B30

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec B30 HS
Model Introduced Year 2025 2025
Generation Current first-generation BAIC B30 for South Africa, introduced locally for the 2025 model year with petrol and self-charging HEV derivatives. Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains.
Facelift History The B30 was unveiled locally in August 2025 and launched in November 2025 as the first South African version; no later local facelift has been announced. Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door mid-size SUV Five-door mid-size SUV
Model Year 2025 2025
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV Mid-size SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec B30 HS
Length 4730 mm 4655 mm
Width 1910 mm 1890 mm
Height 1790 mm 1655 mm
Wheelbase 2820 mm 2765 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 215 mm 145 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed 507 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1590 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2034 kg 2065 kg
Payload Capacity 459 kg 475 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.65 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 968 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 964 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1044 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 980 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This B30 and HS comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: B30 59 vs HS 70.

Efficiency index: B30 51 vs HS 46.

Safety-equipment index: B30 92 vs HS 98.

Practicality index: B30 61 vs HS 57.

Ownership-cover index: B30 not separately scored vs HS not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

HS leads by 3 points

B30 and HS are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 78% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Leads by 3 points
66
#2

B30

70% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 92
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +11 Efficiency B30 +5 Safety HS +6 Practicality B30 +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

B30

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG HS leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 66 pts for B30

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, HS leads. However, B30 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

B30
B30
VS
SEALION 5 DM-i
SEALION 5 DM-i
B30 vs SEALION 5 DM-i →
B30
B30
VS
Taigo
Taigo
B30 vs Taigo →
B30
B30
VS
T1
T1
B30 vs T1 →
B30
B30
VS
Captur
Captur
B30 vs Captur →
B30
B30
VS
ALCAZAR
ALCAZAR
B30 vs ALCAZAR →
B30
B30
VS
J7
J7
B30 vs J7 →
HS
HS
VS
SEALION 5 DM-i
SEALION 5 DM-i
HS vs SEALION 5 DM-i →
HS
HS
VS
Taigo
Taigo
HS vs Taigo →

B30 vs HS questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.