Source type: Ford Uganda / Motorcare exact grade specifications
Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Ford Everest
Active 2.0 Single Turbo 6AT 4WD
Diesel
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 275,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW
🔧 405 Nm
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
LC300 3.3D GR-S 10-AT
Diesel
10-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 703,600,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300: the short answer
Land Cruiser 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Everest.
Everest starts UGX 285,600,000 cheaper
Everest from UGX 275,000,000 · Land Cruiser 300 from UGX 560,600,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Everest | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Everest125 kW @ 3500 rpm | Land Cruiser 300225 kW @ 4000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Everest405 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | Land Cruiser 300700 Nm @ 1600-2600 rpm |
| Engine Size | Everest1996 cc | Land Cruiser 3003346 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | EverestNot Officially Disclosed | Land Cruiser 30012.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Everest229 mm | Land Cruiser 300235 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Everest
Strengths
- Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Everest
- Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix
Land Cruiser 300
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Everest | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current market generation | Uganda LC300 diesel GR-S with the F33A-FTV V6 and front/rear locking differential specification. |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Mid-size body-on-frame SUV | Large seven-seat ladder-frame SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | Everest | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4914 mm | 4985 mm |
| Width | Not Officially Disclosed | 1980 mm |
| Height | 1844 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 229 mm | 235 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 160 mm | 220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 l | 80 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Officially Disclosed | 621 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 2620 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | Not Officially Disclosed | 3230 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 650 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 3500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 3 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.5 m | 5.9 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1030 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 880 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Everest and Land Cruiser 300 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Everest 61 vs Land Cruiser 300 88.
Efficiency index: Everest 47 vs Land Cruiser 300 54.
Safety-equipment index: Everest 89 vs Land Cruiser 300 96.
Practicality index: Everest 76 vs Land Cruiser 300 92.
Ownership-cover index: Everest not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 300 not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Everest and Land Cruiser 300 image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Ford Everest
View 8 more Everest images
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
View 8 more Land Cruiser 300 images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 300 leads by 15 points
Land Cruiser 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Everest.
Evidence leader
84
/100
Lead
15
points
Data
76%
source coverage
84
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
88
Efficiency
54
Safety
96
Practicality
92
Leads by 15 points
69
#2
Everest
Performance
61
Efficiency
47
Safety
89
Practicality
76
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 300 +27
Efficiency
Land Cruiser 300 +7
Safety
Land Cruiser 300 +7
Practicality
Land Cruiser 300 +16
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
88/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
96/100
Practicality
92/100
Everest
Performance
61/100
Efficiency
47/100
Safety
89/100
Practicality
76/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, Everest may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Everest vs Land Cruiser 300 questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.