Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser 78

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Ford Everest in Uganda

Ford Everest

Active 2.0 Single Turbo 6AT 4WD Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 275,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 405 Nm
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 78 in Uganda

Toyota Land Cruiser 78

LC78 4.2L Hard Top 5-MT 4x4 Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
UGX 370,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW 🔧 285 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser 78: the short answer

Everest has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 78 remains close.

Everest starts UGX 95,000,000 cheaper Everest from UGX 275,000,000 · Land Cruiser 78 from UGX 370,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Everest Land Cruiser 78
Maximum Power Everest125 kW @ 3500 rpm Land Cruiser 7896 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Everest405 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm Land Cruiser 78285 Nm @ 2200 rpm
Engine Size Everest1996 cc Land Cruiser 784164 cc
Combined Fuel Economy EverestNot Officially Disclosed Land Cruiser 7812.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Everest229 mm Land Cruiser 78235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Land Cruiser 78

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Everest

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 78

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Everest Land Cruiser 78
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Current market generation Uganda-listed LC78 hard top with 4.2-litre 1HZ diesel, five-speed manual and thirteen-seat catalogue configuration.
Facelift History Current-generation specification No local facelift confirmed
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Hard top
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size body-on-frame SUV Long-wheelbase heavy-duty 4x4
Vehicle Type Passenger SUV Hard-top utility vehicle
Spec Everest Land Cruiser 78
Length 4914 mm 4990 mm
Width Not Officially Disclosed 1770 mm
Height 1844 mm 2115 mm
Wheelbase 2900 mm 2980 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 229 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 180 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed 1000 l
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed 2230 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 3200 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 970 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 13 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows Not Officially Disclosed
Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 6.8 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1030 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 880 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Everest and Land Cruiser 78 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Everest 61 vs Land Cruiser 78 51.

Efficiency index: Everest 47 vs Land Cruiser 78 54.

Safety-equipment index: Everest 89 vs Land Cruiser 78 44.

Practicality index: Everest 76 vs Land Cruiser 78 87.

Ownership-cover index: Everest not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 78 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Everest leads by 10 points

Everest has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 78 remains close.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 69% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

Everest

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 61
Efficiency 47
Safety 89
Practicality 76
Leads by 10 points
59
#2

Land Cruiser 78

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 87 Check Safety 44
Performance 51
Efficiency 54
Safety 44
Practicality 87
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +10 Efficiency Land Cruiser 78 +7 Safety Everest +45 Practicality Land Cruiser 78 +11

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Everest

Performance 61/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 76/100

Land Cruiser 78

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 44/100
Practicality 87/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Everest leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 59 pts for Land Cruiser 78

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Everest leads. However, Land Cruiser 78 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Everest vs Land Cruiser 78 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.