Source type: Ford Uganda / Motorcare exact grade specifications
Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Ford Everest
Active 2.0 Single Turbo 6AT 4WD
Diesel
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 275,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW
🔧 405 Nm
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
2.7 Petrol 6AT 4WD
Petrol
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 265,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW
🔧 245 Nm
⛽ 9.35 km/l
Decision summary
Ford Everest vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ: the short answer
Everest and Land Cruiser FJ are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Land Cruiser FJ starts UGX 10,000,000 cheaper
Everest from UGX 275,000,000 · Land Cruiser FJ from UGX 265,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Everest | Land Cruiser FJ |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Everest125 kW @ 3500 rpm | Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Everest405 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Engine Size | Everest1996 cc | Land Cruiser FJ2694 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | EverestNot Officially Disclosed | Land Cruiser FJ9.35 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Everest229 mm | Land Cruiser FJ245 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Everest
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Land Cruiser FJ
Strengths
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Which One's Right for You?
Everest
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Land Cruiser FJ
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Everest | Land Cruiser FJ |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current market generation | First-generation Land Cruiser FJ with 2.7-litre petrol engine; separate from the earlier FJ Cruiser |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Mid-size body-on-frame SUV | Five-seat ladder-frame 4x4 SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | Everest | Land Cruiser FJ |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4914 mm | 4610 mm |
| Width | Not Officially Disclosed | 1855 mm |
| Height | 1844 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 229 mm | 245 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 160 mm | 200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 l | 63 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Officially Disclosed | 470 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 1920 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | Not Officially Disclosed | 2510 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 590 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 3 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1030 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 880 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Everest and Land Cruiser FJ comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Everest 61 vs Land Cruiser FJ 49.
Efficiency index: Everest 47 vs Land Cruiser FJ 42.
Safety-equipment index: Everest 89 vs Land Cruiser FJ 95.
Practicality index: Everest 76 vs Land Cruiser FJ 65.
Ownership-cover index: Everest not separately scored vs Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Everest and Land Cruiser FJ image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Ford Everest
View 8 more Everest images
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
View 8 more Land Cruiser FJ images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Everest leads by 5 points
Everest and Land Cruiser FJ are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
69
/100
Lead
5
points
Data
69%
source coverage
69
#1
Evidence leader
Everest
Performance
61
Efficiency
47
Safety
89
Practicality
76
Leads by 5 points
64
#2
Land Cruiser FJ
Performance
49
Efficiency
42
Safety
95
Practicality
65
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Everest +12
Efficiency
Everest +5
Safety
Land Cruiser FJ +6
Practicality
Everest +11
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Everest
Performance
61/100
Efficiency
47/100
Safety
89/100
Practicality
76/100
Land Cruiser FJ
Performance
49/100
Efficiency
42/100
Safety
95/100
Practicality
65/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Everest leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Everest vs Land Cruiser FJ questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.