Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
LC300 3.3D GR-S 10-AT
Diesel
10-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 703,600,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
2.8L Diesel 8-AT Adventure
Diesel
8-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 420,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW
🔧 500 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado: the short answer
Land Cruiser 300 and Land Cruiser Prado are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Land Cruiser Prado starts UGX 186,800,000 cheaper
Land Cruiser 300 from UGX 560,600,000 · Land Cruiser Prado from UGX 373,800,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Land Cruiser 300 | Land Cruiser Prado |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Land Cruiser 300225 kW @ 4000 rpm | Land Cruiser Prado150 kW @ 3000-3400 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Land Cruiser 300700 Nm @ 1600-2600 rpm | Land Cruiser Prado500 Nm @ 1600-2800 rpm |
| Engine Size | Land Cruiser 3003346 cc | Land Cruiser Prado2755 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Land Cruiser 30012.5 km/l | Land Cruiser Prado12.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Land Cruiser 300235 mm | Land Cruiser Prado210 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Land Cruiser Prado
Strengths
- Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Which One's Right for You?
Land Cruiser 300
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Land Cruiser Prado
- Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Land Cruiser 300 | Land Cruiser Prado |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Uganda LC300 diesel GR-S with the F33A-FTV V6 and front/rear locking differential specification. | Uganda-listed Prado 250 Series Adventure with the 2.8-litre diesel and eight-speed automatic. |
| Facelift History | No local facelift confirmed | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | Original current-generation version | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Large seven-seat ladder-frame SUV | Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | Land Cruiser 300 | Land Cruiser Prado |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4985 mm | 4920 mm |
| Width | 1980 mm | 1980 mm |
| Height | 1950 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 235 mm | 210 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 220 mm | 200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 l | 110 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 621 l | 620 l |
| Kerb Weight | 2620 kg | 2495 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 3230 kg | 3100 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 650 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 3500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 3 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.9 m | 6.0 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Land Cruiser 300 and Land Cruiser Prado comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Land Cruiser 300 88 vs Land Cruiser Prado 73.
Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 300 54 vs Land Cruiser Prado 54.
Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 300 96 vs Land Cruiser Prado 95.
Practicality index: Land Cruiser 300 92 vs Land Cruiser Prado 82.
Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 300 not separately scored vs Land Cruiser Prado not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Land Cruiser 300 and Land Cruiser Prado image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
View 8 more Land Cruiser 300 images
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
View 8 more Land Cruiser Prado images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 300 leads by 7 points
Land Cruiser 300 and Land Cruiser Prado are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
84
/100
Lead
7
points
Data
76%
source coverage
84
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
88
Efficiency
54
Safety
96
Practicality
92
Leads by 7 points
77
#2
Land Cruiser Prado
Performance
73
Efficiency
54
Safety
95
Practicality
82
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 300 +15
Efficiency
Level
Safety
Land Cruiser 300 +1
Practicality
Land Cruiser 300 +10
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
88/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
96/100
Practicality
92/100
Land Cruiser Prado
Performance
73/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
95/100
Practicality
82/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, Land Cruiser Prado may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Land Cruiser 300 vs Land Cruiser Prado questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.