GWM Steed 5 vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM Steed 5 Discontinued model
GWM Steed 5 in South Africa

GWM Steed 5

2.0VGT Single Cab S 2WD 6MT Diesel Discontinued model
ZAR 307,950 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 320 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 200 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM Steed 5 vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab: the short answer

Steed 5 and Triton Single Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Steed 5: last listed from ZAR 307,950 · Triton Single Cab: current from ZAR 499,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Steed 5 Triton Single Cab
Maximum Power Steed 5110 kW Triton Single Cab81 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque Steed 5320 Nm Triton Single Cab200 Nm @ 1000-3750 rpm
Engine Size Steed 5Not Officially Disclosed Triton Single Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Steed 512.5 km/l Triton Single Cab12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Steed 5194 mm Triton Single Cab200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Steed 5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Triton Single Cab

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Steed 5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Triton Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Steed 5 Triton Single Cab
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024.
Body Style Single-cab pickup Single-cab pickup
Body Type Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name -
Color Note Historical colour availability varied by model year and production batch. -
Dealer Stock Note Base grade in the historical South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0VGT Single Cab S 2WD 6MT -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment Pickup One-ton single-cab pickup
Tare Mass Kg OEM kerb mass not published -
Vehicle Type Pickup Light commercial vehicle
Model Introduced Year Not confirmed 2024
Generation Not confirmed Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Spec Steed 5 Triton Single Cab
Length 5095 mm 5320 mm
Width 1800 mm 1865 mm
Height 1730 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 3050 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 194 mm 200 mm
Seating Capacity 2 seats 2 seats
Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity Not confirmed 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not confirmed 1904 l
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 1625 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not confirmed 2570 kg
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 945 kg
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 0 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 1 rows
Minimum Turning Radius Not confirmed 6.35 m
Front Headroom Not confirmed 1007 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1059 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Steed 5 and Triton Single Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Steed 5 52 vs Triton Single Cab 34.

Efficiency index: Steed 5 54 vs Triton Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: Steed 5 32 vs Triton Single Cab 32.

Practicality index: Steed 5 48 vs Triton Single Cab 72.

Ownership-cover index: Steed 5 65 vs Triton Single Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Steed 5 leads by 3 points

Steed 5 and Triton Single Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 49 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 66% source coverage
49
#1 Evidence leader

Steed 5

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Ownership 65 Check Safety 32
Performance 52
Efficiency 54
Safety 32
Practicality 48
Ownership 65
Leads by 3 points
46
#2

Triton Single Cab

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 72 Check Safety 32
Performance 34
Efficiency 49
Safety 32
Practicality 72
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Steed 5 +18 Efficiency Steed 5 +5 Safety Level Practicality Triton Single Cab +24

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Steed 5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 48/100
Ownership 65/100

Triton Single Cab

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 72/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM Steed 5 leads the specification evidence index with 49 pts vs 46 pts for Triton Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Steed 5 leads. However, Triton Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Steed 5 vs Triton Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.