Ford Ranger Sport vs Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Ford Ranger Sport in South Africa

Ford Ranger Sport

2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2 Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 839,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 222 kW 🔧 452 Nm ⛽ 10.8 km/l
VS
Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab in South Africa

Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab

LTD 4x4 Diesel Mild Hybrid 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 450 Nm ⛽ 11.11 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Ford Ranger Sport vs Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab: the short answer

Ranger Sport and Tunland V9 Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Tunland V9 Double Cab starts ZAR 9,100 cheaper Ranger Sport from ZAR 735,000 · Tunland V9 Double Cab from ZAR 725,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Ranger Sport Tunland V9 Double Cab
Maximum Power Ranger Sport222 kW @ 5900 rpm Tunland V9 Double Cab120 kW @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque Ranger Sport452 Nm Tunland V9 Double Cab450 Nm
Engine Size Ranger Sport2261 cc Tunland V9 Double Cab2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Ranger Sport10.8 km/l Tunland V9 Double Cab11.11 km/l
Ground Clearance Ranger Sport237 mm Tunland V9 Double Cab240 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Ranger Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tunland V9 Double Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Ranger Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tunland V9 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Ranger Sport Tunland V9 Double Cab
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2025
Generation Current South African Ranger Sport listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. The current V9 shares the newer 5,617 mm body footprint and uses a rear multi-link coil-spring arrangement.
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Current South African Tunland V9 range, with no separate facelift identified.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style Double Cab Pickup Double-cab pickup
Body Type Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2 -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size Bakkie Full-size double-cab bakkie
Tare Mass Kg 2055 kg -
Vehicle Type Pickup Light commercial vehicle
Spec Ranger Sport Tunland V9 Double Cab
Length 5350 mm 5617 mm
Width 1918 mm 2000 mm
Height 1886 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase 3270 mm 3355 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 237 mm 240 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 76 l
Kerb Weight 2055 kg 2305 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3100 kg 3055 kg
Payload Capacity 1045 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 12.9 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 1024 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 989 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1057 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 879 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Boot/Cargo Space - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 2 rows

In depth: how these cars differ

This Ranger Sport and Tunland V9 Double Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Ranger Sport 87 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 71.

Efficiency index: Ranger Sport 46 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 53.

Safety-equipment index: Ranger Sport 90 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 90.

Practicality index: Ranger Sport 86 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 84.

Ownership-cover index: Ranger Sport not separately scored vs Tunland V9 Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Ranger Sport leads by 3 points

Ranger Sport and Tunland V9 Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 79 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 55% source coverage
79
#1 Evidence leader

Ranger Sport

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 87
Efficiency 46
Safety 90
Practicality 86
Leads by 3 points
76
#2

Tunland V9 Double Cab

66% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 71
Efficiency 53
Safety 90
Practicality 84
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Sport +16 Efficiency Tunland V9 Double Cab +7 Safety Level Practicality Ranger Sport +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Ranger Sport

Performance 87/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 86/100

Tunland V9 Double Cab

Performance 71/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 84/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Ranger Sport leads the specification evidence index with 79 pts vs 76 pts for Tunland V9 Double Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ranger Sport leads. However, Tunland V9 Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Ranger Sport vs Tunland V9 Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.