Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab vs Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

4.0 V6 Single Cab MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 780,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
VS
Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab in South Africa

Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab

LTD 4x4 Diesel Mild Hybrid 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 450 Nm ⛽ 11.11 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab vs Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab: the short answer

Tunland V9 Double Cab holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab.

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab starts ZAR 19,700 cheaper Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab from ZAR 706,200 · Tunland V9 Double Cab from ZAR 725,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab Tunland V9 Double Cab
Maximum Power Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab202 kW Tunland V9 Double Cab120 kW @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab381 Nm Tunland V9 Double Cab450 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab3956 cc Tunland V9 Double Cab2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab13 km/l Tunland V9 Double Cab11.11 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab235 mm Tunland V9 Double Cab240 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Tunland V9 Double Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Tunland V9 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab Tunland V9 Double Cab
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2025
Generation Current South African Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. The current V9 shares the newer 5,617 mm body footprint and uses a rear multi-link coil-spring arrangement.
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Current South African Tunland V9 range, with no separate facelift identified.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style Pickup Double-cab pickup
Body Type Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Mid grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Pickup Full-size double-cab bakkie
Tare Mass Kg 1850 kg -
Vehicle Type Pickup Light commercial vehicle
Spec Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab Tunland V9 Double Cab
Length 5275 mm 5617 mm
Width 1855 mm 2000 mm
Height 1855 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase 3085 mm 3355 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 235 mm 240 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 l 76 l
Kerb Weight 1850 kg 2305 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2800 kg 3055 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 3 seats 5 seats
Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.4 m Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Boot/Cargo Space - Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom - Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab and Tunland V9 Double Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 78 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 71.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 49 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 53.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 50 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 90.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 73 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab 84.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 43 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tunland V9 Double Cab leads by 15 points

Tunland V9 Double Cab holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 66% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Tunland V9 Double Cab

66% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 71
Efficiency 53
Safety 90
Practicality 84
Leads by 15 points
61
#2

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

77% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 78 Check Ownership 43
Performance 78
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 73
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab +7 Efficiency Tunland V9 Double Cab +4 Safety Tunland V9 Double Cab +40 Practicality Tunland V9 Double Cab +11

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tunland V9 Double Cab

Performance 71/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 84/100

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 73/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Foton Tunland V9 Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 61 pts for Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tunland V9 Double Cab leads. However, Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab vs Tunland V9 Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.