Ford Ranger Raptor vs Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Ford Ranger Raptor in South Africa

Ford Ranger Raptor

Raptor 3.0T V6 10AT 4x4 Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,299,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 292 kW 🔧 583 Nm ⛽ 8.7 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Double Cab

2.4L Bi-Turbo A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 959,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 470 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Ranger Raptor
Fuel Economy Triton Double Cab
🛡 Safety Triton Double Cab
📦 Practicality Triton Double Cab
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Triton Double Cab starts ZAR 659,010 cheaper Ranger Raptor from ZAR 1,299,000 · Triton Double Cab from ZAR 639,990

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Ranger Raptor Triton Double Cab
Maximum Power 292 kW 150 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque 583 Nm 470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm
Engine Size 2993 cc 2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 8.7 km/l 11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 272 mm 228 mm
Boot / Load Bay - 1262 l
Airbags 7 7
Kerb Weight 2432 kg 2035 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 4 years / 120 000 km 5 years / unlimited km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Ranger Raptor and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Ranger Raptor +23 pts
Efficiency Triton Double Cab +7 pts
Safety Triton Double Cab +1 pts
Practicality Triton Double Cab +14 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Catalogue-index leader

Ranger Raptor

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Triton Double Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Ranger Raptor

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Triton Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Ranger Raptor Triton Double Cab
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2024
Generation Current South African Ranger Raptor listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024; Bi-Turbo added in 2026.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double Cab Pickup Double-cab pickup
Body Type Cab Pickup -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: Raptor 3.0T V6 10AT 4x4 -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Performance Bakkie One-ton double-cab pickup
Tare Mass Kg 2432 kg -
Vehicle Type Pickup Light commercial vehicle
Spec Ranger Raptor Triton Double Cab
Length 5381 mm 5360 mm
Width 2028 mm 1930 mm
Height 1922 mm 1815 mm
Wheelbase 3270 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 272 mm 228 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 75 l
Kerb Weight 2432 kg 2035 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3160 kg 3020 kg
Payload Capacity 728 kg 985 kg
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 195 mm
Boot/Cargo Space - 1262 l
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Minimum Turning Radius - 6.35 m
Front Headroom - 1000 mm
Rear Headroom - 972 mm
Front Legroom - 1059 mm
Rear Legroom - 857 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Ranger Raptor leads by 2 points

Ranger Raptor and Triton Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 80 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 62% source coverage
80
#1 Index leader

Ranger Raptor

62% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 98
Efficiency 40
Safety 94
Practicality 76
Leads by 2 points
78
#2

Triton Double Cab

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 95
Practicality 90
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Raptor +23 Efficiency Triton Double Cab +7 Safety Triton Double Cab +1 Practicality Triton Double Cab +14

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Ranger Raptor

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 76/100

Triton Double Cab

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 90/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Ford Ranger Raptor leads the catalogue index with 80 pts vs 78 pts for Triton Double Cab

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Ranger Raptor leads. However, Triton Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Ranger Raptor and Triton Double Cab comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Ranger Raptor 98 vs Triton Double Cab 75.

Efficiency index: Ranger Raptor 40 vs Triton Double Cab 47.

Safety-equipment index: Ranger Raptor 94 vs Triton Double Cab 95.

Practicality index: Ranger Raptor 76 vs Triton Double Cab 90.

Ownership-cover index: Ranger Raptor not separately scored vs Triton Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.