GWM P300 vs Renault Triber Express III

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

GWM P300 in South Africa

GWM P300

2.4T LT 2WD 9AT Diesel Current
ZAR 599,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 480 Nm ⛽ 13.5 km/l
VS
Renault Triber Express III in South Africa

Renault Triber Express III

1.0L with Roof Rack Petrol 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 261,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 53 kW 🔧 96 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM P300 vs Renault Triber Express III: the short answer

P300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Triber Express III.

Triber Express III starts ZAR 164,951 cheaper P300 from ZAR 414,950 · Triber Express III from ZAR 249,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification P300 Triber Express III
Maximum Power P300135 kW Triber Express III53 kW @ 6250 rpm
Maximum Torque P300480 Nm Triber Express III96 Nm @ 3500 rpm
Engine Size P3002400 cc Triber Express III999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy P30013.5 km/l Triber Express III18.2 km/l
Ground Clearance P300224 mm Triber Express III182 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM P300

2.4T LT 2WD 9AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Renault Triber Express III

1.0L with Roof Rack

Hagalu editorial rating
4.4/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

P300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Triber Express III

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

P300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Triber Express III

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec P300 Triber Express III
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2026
Generation Current South African P300 listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Third-generation South African Triber Express light commercial vehicle, announced 10 April 2026 and retailed separately from the preceding Triber Express generation
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. New Express III generation with updated exterior, digital cluster, eight-inch connected touchscreen and standard reversing camera
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup Panel Van
Body Type Cab Pickup -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.4T LT 2WD 9AT -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Pickup Light Commercial Vehicle
Tare Mass Kg 2070 kg 926 kg
Vehicle Type Pickup Panel Van
Spec P300 Triber Express III
Length 5416 mm 3990 mm
Width 1934 mm 1739 mm
Height 1886 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 3230 mm 2636 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 224 mm 182 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm 182 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 l 40 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 l 1500 l
Kerb Weight 2070 kg 926 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3120 kg 1522 kg
Payload Capacity 1050 kg 542 kg
Towing Capacity 3000 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 1 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 5.0 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 970 mm
Rear Headroom 960 mm Not Applicable
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1028 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This P300 and Triber Express III comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: P300 71 vs Triber Express III 23.

Efficiency index: P300 57 vs Triber Express III 69.

Safety-equipment index: P300 not separately scored vs Triber Express III 32.

Practicality index: P300 80 vs Triber Express III 64.

Ownership-cover index: P300 65 vs Triber Express III not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

P300 leads by 24 points

P300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Triber Express III.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 24 points
Data 69% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

P300

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 80 Check Efficiency 57
Performance 71
Efficiency 57
Practicality 80
Ownership 65
Leads by 24 points
45
#2

Triber Express III

69% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 69 Check Performance 23
Performance 23
Efficiency 69
Safety 32
Practicality 64
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance P300 +48 Efficiency Triber Express III +12 Practicality P300 +16

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

P300

Performance 71/100
Efficiency 57/100
Practicality 80/100
Ownership 65/100

Triber Express III

Performance 23/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 64/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM P300 leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 45 pts for Triber Express III

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, P300 leads. However, Triber Express III may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

P300
P300
VS
Tunland G7 Single Cab
Tunland G7 Single Cab
P300 vs Tunland G7 Single Cab →
P300
P300
VS
T8 Double Cab
T8 Double Cab
P300 vs T8 Double Cab →
P300
P300
VS
Tiggo 4 Pro Panel Van
Tiggo 4 Pro Panel Van
P300 vs Tiggo 4 Pro Panel Van →
P300
P300
VS
Pik Up Single Cab
Pik Up Single Cab
P300 vs Pik Up Single Cab →
P300
P300
VS
T60 Utility Single Cab
T60 Utility Single Cab
P300 vs T60 Utility Single Cab →
P300
P300
VS
T6 Single Cab
T6 Single Cab
P300 vs T6 Single Cab →
Triber Express III
Triber Express III
VS
Tunland G7 Single Cab
Tunland G7 Single Cab
Triber Express III vs Tunland G7 Single Cab →
Triber Express III
Triber Express III
VS
T8 Double Cab
T8 Double Cab
Triber Express III vs T8 Double Cab →

P300 vs Triber Express III questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.