Lexus NX vs Mahindra Scorpio-N

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Lexus NX in South Africa

Lexus NX

NX 350 F SPORT Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,276,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 205 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
Mahindra Scorpio-N in South Africa

Mahindra Scorpio-N

Z8L 4x4 AT Adventure Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Lexus NX vs Mahindra Scorpio-N: the short answer

NX and Scorpio-N are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Scorpio-N starts ZAR 584,201 cheaper NX from ZAR 1,074,200 · Scorpio-N from ZAR 489,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification NX Scorpio-N
Maximum Power NX205 kW @ 6000 rpm Scorpio-N128.6 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque NX430 Nm Scorpio-N400 Nm
Engine Size NX2400 cc Scorpio-N2184 cc
Combined Fuel Economy NX12.3 km/l Scorpio-N14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance NX195 mm Scorpio-N187 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

NX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Scorpio-N

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

NX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Scorpio-N

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec NX Scorpio-N
Model Introduced Year 2023 Not Available
Generation Second-generation Lexus NX mid-size luxury SUV Current local listing
Facelift History Current South African range includes petrol, self-charging hybrid and plug-in-hybrid derivatives Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since Current South African range includes petrol, self-charging hybrid and plug-in-hybrid derivatives Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status published Active
Segment Luxury SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1760-1860 kg 1825-2070 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec NX Scorpio-N
Length 4660 mm 4662 mm
Width 1865 mm 1918 mm
Height 1670 mm 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2690 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 195 mm 187 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 520 l 460 l
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2370 kg -
Towing Capacity 1000 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m -

In depth: how these cars differ

This NX and Scorpio-N comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: NX 86 vs Scorpio-N 69.

Efficiency index: NX 49 vs Scorpio-N 60.

Safety-equipment index: NX 93 vs Scorpio-N 90.

Practicality index: NX 65 vs Scorpio-N 78.

Ownership-cover index: NX not separately scored vs Scorpio-N not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

NX leads by 0 points

NX and Scorpio-N are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 70% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

NX

70% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 86
Efficiency 49
Safety 93
Practicality 65
Leads by 0 points
75
#2

Scorpio-N

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 69
Efficiency 60
Safety 90
Practicality 78
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance NX +17 Efficiency Scorpio-N +11 Safety NX +3 Practicality Scorpio-N +13

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

NX

Performance 86/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 65/100

Scorpio-N

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 78/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus NX leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 75 pts for Scorpio-N

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, NX leads. However, Scorpio-N may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

NX
NX
VS
T2 i-DM
T2 i-DM
NX vs T2 i-DM →
NX
NX
VS
C9
C9
NX vs C9 →
NX
NX
VS
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
NX vs Pajero Sport →
NX
NX
VS
CX-60
CX-60
NX vs CX-60 →
NX
NX
VS
RAV4
RAV4
NX vs RAV4 →
NX
NX
VS
Tayron
Tayron
NX vs Tayron →
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
VS
T2 i-DM
T2 i-DM
Scorpio-N vs T2 i-DM →
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
VS
C9
C9
Scorpio-N vs C9 →

NX vs Scorpio-N questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.