Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs KIA Tasman

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
VS
KIA Tasman in South Africa

KIA Tasman

2.2D X-Pro 4x4 Double Cab Colour Coded Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,004,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 147 kW 🔧 440 Nm Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tasman
Fuel Economy NP300 Hardbody
🛡 Safety Tasman
📦 Practicality Tasman
🔑 Ownership Tasman
NP300 Hardbody starts ZAR 679995 cheaper NP300 Hardbody from ZAR 349,900 · Tasman from ZAR 679,995

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec NP300 Hardbody Tasman
Engine Power 98 147 kW
Torque 304 440 Nm
Engine Size 2488 2151
Claimed Mileage 11.4 11.8
Ground Clearance 215 231
Boot Space Not Applicable 1115
Airbags 4 6
Kerb Weight 1395 2085
Seating Capacity Available 5
Warranty 3 7

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Tasman

73
/ 100
+24
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

The Bottom Line

Tasman holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tasman +5 pts
Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +7 pts
Safety Tasman +6 pts
Practicality Tasman +12 pts
Ownership Tasman +8 pts

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Tasman

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 20/20
Ownership 20/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Tasman

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Tasman

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec NP300 Hardbody Tasman
Ground Clearance 215 231
Wheelbase 2500 3200
Length 4875 5335
Width 1760 1930
Height 1655 1895
Kerb Weight 1395 2085
Gross Vehicle Weight 2400 3250
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space Not Applicable 1115
Towing Capacity 2500 3500
Front Track Width 1495 1619
Rear Track Width 1490 1625
Turning Radius 5.8 12.6
Load Bed Length 1907 1520
Load Bed Width 1454 1165
Number of Doors 5 4
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1115
Front Legroom Available 1040
Rear Legroom Available 855
Front Headroom Available 1010
Rear Headroom Available 955
Front Shoulder Room Available 1405
Rear Shoulder Room Available 1350
Max Payload Available 1100
Boot Volume Available 1115
Doors Available 4
Seats Available 5
Front Overhang Available 940
Fuel Tank Capacity Available 80
Rear Overhang Available 1195
Spec NP300 Hardbody Tasman
Engine 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel 2.2 CRDi D4HB Inline-4 Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder Turbodiesel
Displacement 2488 2151
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 16
Power 98 147 kW
Power @ RPM 3600 rpm 3,800 rpm
Torque 304 440 Nm
Torque @ RPM 1750-2500 rpm 1,750 rpm
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo Yes
Top Speed 168 185
0-100 km/h 12.5 9.8
Compression Ratio 17.5:1 15.4:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Transverse
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard D4HB
Cylinder Bore 82.0 85.4
Piston Stroke 92.0 94.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol B7 Diesel
Engine Oil Capacity Available 7.0
Power 150 197
Variable Valve Timing Available No
Maximum Engine RPM Available 4,000 rpm
Engine Type Config Available Inline 4 Cylinder (I4) DOHC 16-Valve Diesel
0–100 km/h Available 9.8
Battery Capacity Available N/A
Charging Port Available N/A
AC Charging Time Available N/A
Engine Displacement Available 2151
EV Range Available N/A

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 KIA Tasman wins with 73 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Tasman emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tasman edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: NP300 Hardbody 7 vs Tasman 0. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: NP300 Hardbody 12, Tasman 18. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: NP300 Hardbody 12, Tasman 20. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: NP300 Hardbody 8, Tasman 20. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: NP300 Hardbody 10, Tasman 15. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tasman edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tasman scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between NP300 Hardbody and Tasman in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP300 Hardbody scores 10 vs 15.

Efficiency: NP300 Hardbody scores 7 vs 0.

Safety: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 18.

Practicality: NP300 Hardbody scores 8 vs 20.

Ownership: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Tasman the advantage in this comparison.