Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Ford Ranger Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic Archive reference
ZAR 529,900 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
VS
Ford Ranger Sport in South Africa

Ford Ranger Sport

2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2 Petrol Automatic
ZAR 839,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 222 kW 🔧 452 Nm ⛽ 10.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Ranger Sport
Fuel Economy NP300 Hardbody
🛡 Safety Ranger Sport
📦 Practicality Ranger Sport
🔑 Ownership NP300 Hardbody
NP300 Hardbody starts ZAR 735000 cheaper NP300 Hardbody from ZAR 349,900 · Ranger Sport from ZAR 735,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec NP300 Hardbody Ranger Sport
Engine Power Not confirmed 222
Torque Not confirmed 452
Engine Size Not confirmed 2261
Claimed Mileage Not confirmed 10.8
Ground Clearance Not confirmed 237
Boot Space Not confirmed Not Applicable
Airbags Not confirmed Dual front, front side, curtain and driver knee
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 2055
Seating Capacity Not confirmed 5
Warranty Not confirmed 4 years / 120 000 km

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Ranger Sport holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Ranger Sport +37 pts
Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +4 pts
Safety Ranger Sport +47 pts
Practicality Ranger Sport +36 pts
Ownership NP300 Hardbody +16 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Ranger Sport

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec NP300 Hardbody Ranger Sport
Model Introduced Year Not confirmed Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Not confirmed Current South African Ranger Sport listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Not confirmed Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Double Cab Pickup
Body Type Cab Not confirmed Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note Not confirmed Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.3T EcoBoost Double Cab Sport 10AT 4x2
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Mid-size Bakkie
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Pickup
Spec NP300 Hardbody Ranger Sport
Ground Clearance Not confirmed 237 mm
Wheelbase Not confirmed 3270 mm
Length Not confirmed 5350 mm
Width Not confirmed 1918 mm
Height Not confirmed 1886 mm
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 2055 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight Not confirmed 3100 kg
Seating Capacity Not confirmed 5
Boot Space Not confirmed Not Applicable
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 3500 kg
Front Track Width Not confirmed 1620 mm
Rear Track Width Not confirmed 1620 mm
Turning Radius Not confirmed 12.9 m
Load Bed Length Not confirmed Not Applicable
Load Bed Width Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1057 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed 879 mm
Front Headroom Not confirmed 1024 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 989 mm
Front Shoulder Room Not confirmed 1450 mm
Rear Shoulder Room Not confirmed 1440 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded Not confirmed Not Applicable
Number of Doors Not confirmed 4
Max Payload Not confirmed 1045 kg
Boot Volume Not confirmed Not Applicable
Doors Not confirmed 4
Seats Not confirmed 5
Fuel Tank Capacity Not confirmed 80 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg Not confirmed 3100 kg
Ground Clearance Max Not confirmed 237 mm
Ground Clearance Min Not confirmed 237 mm
Ground Clearance Mm Not confirmed 237 mm
Height Mm Not confirmed 1886 mm
Length Mm Not confirmed 5350 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Not confirmed Not Applicable
Loadbox Width Mm Not confirmed Not Applicable
Payload Kg Not confirmed 1045 kg
Cargo Volume Not confirmed Not Applicable
Tare Mass Kg Not confirmed 2055 kg
Tracking System Not confirmed Vehicle locator via app
Turning Circle Not confirmed 12.9 m
Turning Circle M Not confirmed 12.9 m
Width Mm Not confirmed 1918 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Ranger Sport leads by 24 points

Ranger Sport holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 63 /100
Lead 24 points
Data 71% confidence
63
#1 Winner

Ranger Sport

71% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 87 Check Ownership 34
Performance 87
Efficiency 46
Safety 47
Practicality 86
Ownership 34
Leads by 24 points
39
#2

NP300 Hardbody

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Sport +37 Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +4 Safety Ranger Sport +47 Practicality Ranger Sport +36 Ownership NP300 Hardbody +16

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Ranger Sport

Performance 87/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 47/100
Practicality 86/100
Ownership 34/100

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Ranger Sport wins with 63 pts vs 39 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Ranger Sport emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Ranger Sport edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: NP300 Hardbody 50 vs Ranger Sport 46. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: NP300 Hardbody 0, Ranger Sport 47. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: NP300 Hardbody 50, Ranger Sport 34. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: NP300 Hardbody 50, Ranger Sport 86. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: NP300 Hardbody 50, Ranger Sport 87. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Ranger Sport edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Ranger Sport scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between NP300 Hardbody and Ranger Sport in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP300 Hardbody scores 50 vs 87.

Efficiency: NP300 Hardbody scores 50 vs 46.

Safety: NP300 Hardbody scores 0 vs 47.

Practicality: NP300 Hardbody scores 50 vs 86.

Ownership: NP300 Hardbody scores 50 vs 34.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger Sport the advantage in this comparison.